BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 947924)

  • 21. Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part II: The implant/bone interface.
    Albert K; Schledjewski R; Harbaugh M; Bleser S; Jamison R; Friedrich K
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 7950869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. From natural products to polymeric derivatives of "eugenol": a new approach for preparation of dental composites and orthopedic bone cements.
    Rojo L; Vazquez B; Parra J; López Bravo A; Deb S; San Roman J
    Biomacromolecules; 2006 Oct; 7(10):2751-61. PubMed ID: 17025349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A vitreous carbon-polymethacrylate composite for dental implants.
    Hodosh M; Shklar G; Povar M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jan; 9(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 1176473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Porous polymethylmethacrylate as a bone replacement material].
    de Wijn JR
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1981 Dec; 88(12):429-36. PubMed ID: 6950233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Acrylic bone cements modified with beta-TCP particles encapsulated with poly(ethylene glycol).
    Vázquez B; Ginebra MP; Gil X; Planell JA; San Román J
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(20):4309-16. PubMed ID: 15683655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mechanical properties of polymeric membranes obtained by radiation cast-polymerization of hydroxyalkyl and hydroxypolyethyleneglycol methacrylate monomers.
    Kumakura M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1986 Apr; 20(4):521-31. PubMed ID: 3700445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A characterization of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.
    Haas SS; Brauer GM; Dickson G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1975 Apr; 57(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 1123392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of centrifugation and titanium fiber reinforcement on fatigue failure mechanisms in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement.
    Topoleski LD; Ducheyne P; Cuckler JM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Mar; 29(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 7615581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of surface modification of polymer beads on the mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement.
    Shafranska O; Kokott A; Sülthaus D; Ziegler G
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2007; 18(4):439-51. PubMed ID: 17540118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bond strength of prosthodontic luting materials to titanium after localized cyclic loading.
    Taira Y; Suzuki S; Givan DA; Lacefield W; Atsuta M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 11764111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wettability of hydrogels. I. Poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate).
    Holly FJ; Refojo MF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 May; 9(3):315-26. PubMed ID: 1176489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the flexural strength of five adhesive resin cements.
    Pace LL; Hummel SK; Marker VA; Bolouri A
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Thermal aspects of self-curing polymethylmethacrylate.
    Jefferiss CD; Lee AJ; Ling RS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1975 Nov; 57(4):511-8. PubMed ID: 1194321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of thermally reduced graphene sheets on the phase behavior, morphology, and electrical conductivity in poly[(α-methyl styrene)-co-(acrylonitrile)/poly(methyl-methacrylate) blends.
    Vleminckx G; Bose S; Leys J; Vermant J; Wübbenhorst M; Abdala AA; Macosko C; Moldenaers P
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2011 Aug; 3(8):3172-80. PubMed ID: 21749102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Temperature-sensitive aqueous microgels.
    Pelton R
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Feb; 85(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 10696447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiopaque acrylic cements prepared with a new acrylic derivative of iodo-quinoline.
    Vázquez B; Ginebra MP; Gil FJ; Planell JA; López Bravo A; San Román J
    Biomaterials; 1999 Nov; 20(21):2047-53. PubMed ID: 10535816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Determination of hardening properties and processing range of bone cements].
    Buchhorn U; Kistner D; Willert HG; Semlitsch M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1982; 120(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 7164542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Porous acrylic cement: evaluation of a novel implant material.
    van Mullem PJ; de Wijn JR; Vaandrager JM
    Ann Plast Surg; 1988 Dec; 21(6):576-82. PubMed ID: 3071237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Characterization of self-curing acrylic bone cements.
    Kusy RP
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1978 May; 12(3):271-305. PubMed ID: 670253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comments on "a numerical simulation of acrylic grout curing in a femoral implant".
    Jefferiss CD; Ling RS; Lee AJ; Vangala SS
    J Biomech; 1980; 13(8):733-4. PubMed ID: 7419540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.