548 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9479333)
41. Wisconsin Cytology Proficiency Testing Program. Results of voluntary testing in 1994.
Smith MA; Shalkham JE; Inhorn SL
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1681-9. PubMed ID: 9390124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Appeals in gynecologic cytology proficiency testing: review and analysis of data from the 2006 College of American Pathologists gynecologic cytology proficiency testing program.
Crothers BA; Moriarty AT; Fatheree LA; Booth CN; Tench WD; Wilbur DC;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Jan; 133(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 19123735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Validation of an electronic program for pathologist training in the interpretation of a complex companion diagnostic immunohistochemical assay.
Dennis E; Banks P; Murata LB; Sanchez SA; Pennington C; Hockersmith L; Miller R; Lambe J; Feng J; Kapadia M; Clements J; Loftin I; Singh S; Das-Gupta A; Lloyd W; Bloom K
Hum Pathol; 2016 Oct; 56():194-203. PubMed ID: 27349303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. General quality practices in gynecologic cytopathology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3.
Tworek J; Nayar R; Savaloja L; Tabbara S; Thomas N; Winkler B; Howell LP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 23368861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. AutoCyte SCREEN interactive automated primary cytology screening system. A preliminary evaluation.
Takahashi M; Kimura M; Akagi A; Naitoh M
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 9479338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The Yorkshire slide exchange external quality assessment (EQA) scheme.
Boon AP; Williamson P; Brown JM; Thomas GD
Cytopathology; 1996 Apr; 7(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 9074658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The role of monitoring interpretive rates, concordance between cytotechnologist and pathologist interpretations before sign-out, and turnaround time in gynecologic cytology quality assurance: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 1.
Clary KM; Davey DD; Naryshkin S; Austin RM; Thomas N; Chmara BA; Sugrue C; Tworek J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 23368858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Automated rescreening in cervical cytology. Mathematical models for evaluating overall process sensitivity, specificity and cost.
Kaminsky FC; Benneyan JC; Mullins DL
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):209-23. PubMed ID: 9022745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. PAPNET Testing System. Technical update.
Denaro TJ; Herriman JM; Shapira O
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 9022728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Education and training for cytopathologists. Its role in quality assurance.
Parker JE
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):448-50. PubMed ID: 2750433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Diagnostic proficiency test using digital cytopathology and comparative assessment of whole slide images of cytologic samples for quality assurance program in Korea.
Chong Y; Hong SA; Oh HK; Jung SJ; Kim BS; Jeong JY; Lee HC; Gong G
J Pathol Transl Med; 2023 Sep; 57(5):251-264. PubMed ID: 37608552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The value of expert review in prospective trials of automated assisted screening devices.
Renshaw AA; Elsheikh TM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Feb; 42(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 23636929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control.
Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P
Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology.
Evered A; Dudding N
Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 20482714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Government-mandated cytology proficiency testing: practical, equitable, and defensible standards.
DeBoy JM; Jarboe BR
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1991 May; 17(5):152-61. PubMed ID: 2052350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
Joste N
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Regarding the validity of cytology proficiency testing.
Cramer SF
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Mar; 22(3):201-2. PubMed ID: 10680004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Maryland's cytology labs: 1989-90 proficiency testing results.
DeBoy JM; Jarboe BR
Md Med J; 1991 Feb; 40(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 1847738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The development of a quality assurance programme for HPV testing within the UK NHS cervical screening LBC/HPV studies.
Cubie HA; Moore C; Waller M; Moss S;
J Clin Virol; 2005 Aug; 33(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 16036178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
