129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9479335)
1. Impact of automated technology on the cervical cytologic smear. A comparison of cost.
Grohs DH
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 9479335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of costs and benefits of advances in cytologic technology. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Melamed MR; Hutchinson ML; Kaufman EA; Schechter CB; Garner D; Kobler TP; Krieger PA; Reith A; Schenck U
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 9479325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
Austin RM; Ramzy I
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of automated and semi-automated cervical screening devices: a systematic review of the literature.
Broadstock M
N Z Med J; 2001 Jul; 114(1135):311-3. PubMed ID: 11556445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospects for newer technologies in cervical cancer screening programmes.
Hailey DM; Lea R
J Qual Clin Pract; 1995 Sep; 15(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 8528539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CytoRich liquid-based cervical cytologic test. Screening results in a routine cytopathology service.
Vassilakos P; Griffin S; Megevand E; Campana A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 9479340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computerized screening devices and performance assessment: development of a policy towards automation. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Hutchinson ML; Gahm T; Grohs HK; Gwi-Mak E; Kaufman EA; Kaufman RH; Knight BK; Koss LG; Magruder LE; Mango LJ; McCallum SM; Melamed MR; Peebles A; Richart RM; Robinowitz M; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Schenck U; Tanaka N; Topalidis T; Verhest AP; Wertlake PT; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 9479324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cost of production in cervical cytology: comparison of conventional and automated primary screening systems.
Bishop JW
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Apr; 107(4):445-50. PubMed ID: 9124213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.
Williamson SL; Hair T; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 9202894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advances in cervical screening technology.
Stoler MH
Mod Pathol; 2000 Mar; 13(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 10757338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of the TracCell system in mapping Papanicolaou-stained cytologic material.
Grohs DH; Dadeshidze VV; Domanik RA; Gombrich PP; Olsson LJ; Pressman NJ
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 9022737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The primary screening clinical trials of the TriPath AutoPap System.
Wilbur DC; Norton MK
Epidemiology; 2002 May; 13 Suppl 3():S30-3. PubMed ID: 12071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AutoCyte SCREEN interactive automated primary cytology screening system. A preliminary evaluation.
Takahashi M; Kimura M; Akagi A; Naitoh M
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 9479338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated rescreening in cervical cytology. Mathematical models for evaluating overall process sensitivity, specificity and cost.
Kaminsky FC; Benneyan JC; Mullins DL
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):209-23. PubMed ID: 9022745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality control and automation in cervical cytology.
Kumar N; Jain S
J Indian Med Assoc; 2004 Jul; 102(7):372, 374, 376 pasim. PubMed ID: 15717583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [New techniques in cytology: liquid milieu and thin slides].
Joris F; Richard J; Tötsch M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1999 Oct; 119(10):793-8. PubMed ID: 10582491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
