171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9479339)
1. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.
Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology.
Howell LP; Davis RL; Belk TI; Agdigos R; Lowe J
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 9479336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CytoRich liquid-based cervical cytologic test. Screening results in a routine cytopathology service.
Vassilakos P; Griffin S; Megevand E; Campana A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 9479340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology. Preliminary data on 2,032 cases from a clinical trial site.
Bishop JW
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 9022721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
Austin RM; Ramzy I
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation.
Hessling JJ; Raso DS; Schiffer B; Callicott J; Husain M; Taylor D
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 11725731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AutoCyte Prep system vs. conventional cervical cytology. Comparison based on 2,156 cases.
Minge L; Fleming M; VanGeem T; Bishop JW
J Reprod Med; 2000 Mar; 45(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 10756493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual sampling of the endocervix and its impact on AutoCyte Prep endocervical adequacy.
Day SJ; Deszo EL; Freund GG
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jul; 118(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 12109854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AutoCyte SCREEN interactive automated primary cytology screening system. A preliminary evaluation.
Takahashi M; Kimura M; Akagi A; Naitoh M
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 9479338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. Direct-to-vial performance.
Tench W
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):912-6. PubMed ID: 11127103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy.
Bergeron C; Bishop J; Lemarie A; Cas F; Ayivi J; Huynh B; Barrasso R
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11480712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical trials of the CytoRich specimen-preparation device for cervical cytology. Preliminary results.
Wilbur DC; Facik MS; Rutkowski MA; Mulford DK; Atkison KM
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 9022722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
Mango LJ; Valente PT
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct-to-vial experience with AutoCyte PREP in a small New England regional cytology practice.
Marino JF; Fremont-Smith M
J Reprod Med; 2001 Apr; 46(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 11354836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
Bishop JW; Kaufman RH; Taylor DA
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system.
Bolick DR; Hellman DJ
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9479342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biopsy-based comparison of liquid-based, thin-layer preparations to conventional Pap smears.
Vassilakos P; Schwartz D; de Marval F; Yousfi L; Broquet G; Mathez-Loic F; Campana A; Major A
J Reprod Med; 2000 Jan; 45(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10664941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of residual AutoCyte cervical cytology samples for image analysis.
Bishop JW; Cheuvront DA; Elston RJ
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 9987449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
