These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9479345)

  • 1. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
    Mango LJ; Valente PT
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
    Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge.
    Solomon HM; Frist S
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 9479348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CytoRich liquid-based cervical cytologic test. Screening results in a routine cytopathology service.
    Vassilakos P; Griffin S; Megevand E; Campana A
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 9479340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
    Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
    Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
    Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative cervical smears before CIN 3/carcinoma. Reevaluation with the PAPNET Testing System.
    Doornewaard H; van de Seijp H; Woudt JM; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 9022729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: II. Prospective and archival sensitivity studies.
    Patten SF; Lee JS; Wilbur DC; Bonfiglio TA; Colgan TJ; Richart RM; Cramer H; Moinuddin S
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 9438459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET Testing System.
    Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 9022730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PAPNET analysis of reportedly negative smears preceding the diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or carcinoma.
    Sherman ME; Mango LJ; Kelly D; Paull G; Ludin V; Copeland C; Solomon D; Schiffman MH
    Mod Pathol; 1994 Jun; 7(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 7937724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.
    Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
    Austin RM; Ramzy I
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears.
    Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consistency of a double PAPNET scan of cervical smears.
    Jenny J; Isenegger I; Boon ME; Husain OA
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 9022731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactive neural-network-assisted screening. A clinical assessment.
    Mango LJ; Radensky PW
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):233-45. PubMed ID: 9479346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactive neural-network-assisted screening. An economic assessment.
    Radensky PW; Mango LJ
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):246-52. PubMed ID: 9479347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
    O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW
    JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System).
    Koss LG; Sherman ME; Cohen MB; Anes AR; Darragh TM; Lemos LB; McClellan BJ; Rosenthal DL; Keyhani-Rofagha S; Schreiber K; Valente PT
    Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1196-203. PubMed ID: 9343327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.