BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

33 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9479349)

  • 1. Detection of laboratory false negative smears by the PAPNET cytologic screening system.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 9479350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
    Mango LJ; Valente PT
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
    Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
    Austin RM; Ramzy I
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge.
    Solomon HM; Frist S
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 9479348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical validation of interactive cytologic screening. Automating the search, not the interpretation.
    Mango LJ
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 9022733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technologic advances for evaluation of cervical cytology: is newer better?
    Hartmann KE; Nanda K; Hall S; Myers E
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2001 Dec; 56(12):765-74. PubMed ID: 11753179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated rescreening in cervical cytology. Mathematical models for evaluating overall process sensitivity, specificity and cost.
    Kaminsky FC; Benneyan JC; Mullins DL
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):209-23. PubMed ID: 9022745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of automated technology on the cervical cytologic smear. A comparison of cost.
    Grohs DH
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 9479335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized training and proficiency testing. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Vooijs GP; Davey DD; Somrak TM; Goodell RM; Grohs DH; Knesel EA; Mango LJ; Mui KK; Nielsen ML; Wilbur DC
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 9479333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.