These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9479751)

  • 1. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. I. Frequency effects.
    Lasky RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):981-91. PubMed ID: 9479751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. II. Level effects.
    Lasky RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):992-1000. PubMed ID: 9479752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
    Gorga MP; Norton SJ; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):400-24. PubMed ID: 11059701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Whitehead ML; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3200-14. PubMed ID: 8550945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
    Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationships among standard and wideband measures of middle ear function and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Schairer KS; Morrison B; Szewczyk E; Fowler CG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):253-64. PubMed ID: 21756841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicomponent acoustic distortion product otoacoustic emission phase in humans. II. Implications for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generation.
    Moulin A; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1640-62. PubMed ID: 8817892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
    Sun XM; Shaver MD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multicomponent acoustic distortion product otoacoustic emission phase in humans. I. General characteristics.
    Moulin A; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1617-39. PubMed ID: 8817891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans.
    Dreisbach LE; Siegel JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2456-69. PubMed ID: 11757935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal Development of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants With Normal Hearing.
    Hunter LL; Blankenship CM; Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Brown DK; McCune A; Fitzpatrick DF; Lin L
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):863-873. PubMed ID: 29369290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.