These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9479756)

  • 1. Cross-modality matching and the loudness growth function for click stimuli.
    Serpanos YC; O'Malley H; Gravel JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1022-32. PubMed ID: 9479756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between loudness intensity functions and the click-ABR wave V latency.
    Serpanos YC; O'Malley H; Gravel JS
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):409-19. PubMed ID: 9360864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-modality matching: a tool for measuring loudness in sensorineural impairment.
    Hellman RP
    Ear Hear; 1999 Jun; 20(3):193-213. PubMed ID: 10386847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rate of loudness growth for pure tones in normal and impaired hearing.
    Hellman RP; Meiselman CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):966-75. PubMed ID: 8445131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing growth of loudness in children by cross-modality matching.
    Serpanos YC; Gravel JS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):190-202. PubMed ID: 10783922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loudness relations for individuals and groups in normal and impaired hearing.
    Hellman RP; Meiselman CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2596-606. PubMed ID: 2283432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deriving loudness growth functions from categorical loudness scaling data.
    Wróblewski M; Rasetshwane DM; Neely ST; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):3660. PubMed ID: 29289103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of loudness scaling.
    Robinson K; Gatehouse S
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 8698158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of individual loudness exponents from cross-modality matching.
    Hellman RP; Meiselman CH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 3230890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting loudness measures in children using a computer method of cross-modality matching (CMM).
    Serpanos YC; Gravel JS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004; 15(7):486-97. PubMed ID: 15484598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnitude estimation of loudness. II: Loudness perception in presbycusic listeners.
    Knight KK; Margolis RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 6717004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contour test of loudness perception.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Taylor IM; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):388-400. PubMed ID: 9360862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement and modeling of binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC; Gibbs A; Onions G; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):736-47. PubMed ID: 25096108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual grouping of tone sequences by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Rose MM; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1768-78. PubMed ID: 9301054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective estimation of loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Silva I; Epstein M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):353-62. PubMed ID: 22280597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimized loudness-function estimation for categorical loudness scaling data.
    Oetting D; Brand T; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():16-27. PubMed ID: 25058812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Growth of loudness in listeners with cochlear hearing losses: recruitment reconsidered.
    Buus S; Florentine M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 3(2):120-39. PubMed ID: 12162363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal analysis and stimulus fluctuation in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Hall JW; Grose JH; Buss E; Hatch DR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Apr; 41(2):340-54. PubMed ID: 9570587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.