These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9479756)

  • 21. Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.
    Kamm C; Dirks DD; Mickey MR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Dec; 21(4):668-81. PubMed ID: 745368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A method for relating loudness-matching and intensity-discrimination data.
    Schlauch RS; Wier CC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 3560891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The relation between loudness and intensity difference limens for tones in quiet and noise backgrounds.
    Rankovic CM; Viemeister NF; Fantini DA; Cheesman MF; Uchiyama CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3411042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The growth of loudness functions measured in cochlear implant listeners using absolute magnitude estimation and compared using Akaike's information criterion.
    Sanpetrino NM; Smith RL
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1642-4. PubMed ID: 17946915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intensity perception. XIV. Intensity discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Braida LD; Durlach NI; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2575-86. PubMed ID: 8270735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions.
    Epstein M; Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):907-13. PubMed ID: 16158646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mid-bandwidth loudness depression in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hots J; Jarzombek K; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2334. PubMed ID: 27250129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Restoring Perceived Loudness for Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):664-678. PubMed ID: 29210810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relation between the growth of loudness and high-frequency excitation.
    Hellman RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2655-63. PubMed ID: 7983271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Magnitude estimation of loudness. I: Application to hearing aid selection.
    Geller D; Margolis RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 6717003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones.
    Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Magnitude estimation of loudness. III: Performance of selected hearing aid users.
    Margolis RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 4046582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intensity just-noticeable differences at equal-loudness levels in normal and pathological ears.
    Stillman JA; Zwislocki JJ; Zhang M; Cefaratti LK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):425-34. PubMed ID: 8423259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory brainstem responses to CE-Chirp® stimuli for normal ears and those with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Cho SW; Han KH; Jang HK; Chang SO; Jung H; Lee JH
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):700-4. PubMed ID: 25997814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Summation bandwidths at threshold in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Higgins MB; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2625-30. PubMed ID: 2283435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Basilar membrane nonlinearity and loudness.
    Schlauch RS; DiGiovanni JJ; Ries DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2010-20. PubMed ID: 9566323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Loudness of dynamic stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Zhang C; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2925-34. PubMed ID: 9373979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.