These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9479925)

  • 1. Capsulated versus hand-mixed glass-ionomer luting cements for post retention.
    Mitchell CA; Orr JF; Russell MD
    J Dent; 1998 Jan; 26(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 9479925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements.
    Pereira JR; Rosa RA; Só MV; Afonso D; Kuga MC; Honório HM; Valle AL; Vidotti HA
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 25004052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
    Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of posts with resin, glass ionomer and hybrid cements.
    Love RM; Purton DG
    J Dent; 1998 Sep; 26(7):599-602. PubMed ID: 9754749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of cement type on retention of a tapered post with a self-cutting double thread.
    Rosin M; Splieth C; Wilkens M; Meyer G
    J Dent; 2000 Nov; 28(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 11082526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns.
    Mitchell CA; Abbariki M; Orr JF
    Dent Mater; 2000 May; 16(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 10762680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements.
    Mitchell CA; Douglas WH; Cheng YS
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10483390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of early water contact on solubility of glass ionomer luting cements.
    Gemalmaz D; Yoruc B; Ozcan M; Alkumru HN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):474-8. PubMed ID: 9791796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents: an in vitro study.
    Duncan JP; Pameijer CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 9791788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of triturator speed variation on physical properties of encapsulated glass-ionomer luting cements.
    Rupp DC; Hermesch CB; Charlton DG
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):96-102. PubMed ID: 9002868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage on retentive strengths of luting cements for zirconia crowns.
    Ehlers V; Kampf G; Stender E; Willershausen B; Ernst CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 25794911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of luting cement and thermomechanical loading on retention of glass fibre posts in root canals.
    Li XJ; Zhao SJ; Niu LN; Tay FR; Jiao K; Gao Y; Chen JH
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 24200871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements.
    Mendoza DB; Eakle WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):591-4. PubMed ID: 7853255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 9597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of four glass ionomer luting cements during post pull-out tests.
    Mitchell CA; Orr JF; Connor KN; Magill JP; Maguire GR
    Dent Mater; 1994 Mar; 10(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 7758854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.