These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9480546)

  • 21. Clinton's mixed broth for R&D.
    Marshall E; Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Apr; 260(5106):284-5. PubMed ID: 8469979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reinvesting in US biomedical research--the time is now.
    Yang VW
    Gastroenterology; 2009 Oct; 137(4):1202-3. PubMed ID: 19732858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. U.S. science funding. Research catches a break in catch-all spending bill.
    Mervis J; Lawler A; Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Dec; 302(5651):1636-7. PubMed ID: 14657461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Science in the national interest.
    Abelson PH
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5149):899. PubMed ID: 8310282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Balancing the science budget.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2000 Feb; 287(5455):952-5. PubMed ID: 10691566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. NIH basks in broad support.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):522. PubMed ID: 9468124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The hand on your purse strings.
    Mikulski B
    Science; 1994 Apr; 264(5156):192-4. PubMed ID: 8146645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. NIH leads research gains as Congress picks up pace.
    Lawler A; Marshall E; Mervis J; Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Jul; 277(5325):470-1. PubMed ID: 9254415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. U.S. research forum fails to find a common front.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5148):752. PubMed ID: 8303289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gibbons warns of decline in R&D.
    Lawler A
    Science; 1996 Dec; 274(5294):1830. PubMed ID: 8984638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. R&D budget: more wins than losses.
    Mervis J; Anderson C; Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Jan; 263(5144):164-5. PubMed ID: 8284665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Large research facilities to lose out in science spending spree?
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6793):221-2. PubMed ID: 10917492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Science budget: growth amid red ink.
    Norman C
    Science; 1991 Feb; 251(4994):616-8. PubMed ID: 1992512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
    Lawler A; Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5702):1662-3. PubMed ID: 15576575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. DOE to industry: so long, partner.
    Lawler A
    Science; 1996 Oct; 274(5284):24-6. PubMed ID: 8848717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. NSF gears up for a building boom.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1994 Sep; 265(5178):1516-8. PubMed ID: 8079162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 2000 budget. Thanks to NIH, R&D ends up with 5% boost.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 1999 Dec; 286(5446):1836. PubMed ID: 10610571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New rules loom for US science funding as Congress passes a lean 1993 budget.
    Anderson C; Mervis J; Watson T
    Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6396):566-7. PubMed ID: 1406980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The readers' NIH.
    Rosenberg BH
    Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5082):530. PubMed ID: 1411553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Science policy. Caught in the squeeze.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):832-4. PubMed ID: 15705818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.