BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9480608)

  • 1. [Ovarian activity, cycle behavior and tolerance of low dosage oral contraceptives: a comparative study].
    Rossmanith WG; Wirth U; Gasser S; Thun B; Steffens D
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(11):538-44. PubMed ID: 9480608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative randomized trial on the impact of two low-dose oral contraceptives on ovarian activity, cervical permeability, and endometrial receptivity.
    Rossmanith WG; Steffens D; Schramm G
    Contraception; 1997 Jul; 56(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9306028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative profiles of reliability, cycle control and side effects of two oral contraceptive formulations containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and either 30 micrograms or 20 micrograms ethinyl oestradiol.
    Akerlund M; Røde A; Westergaard J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Sep; 100(9):832-8. PubMed ID: 8218004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Individualization of low-dose oral contraceptives. Pharmacological principles and practical indications for oral contraceptives].
    Cianci A; De Leo V
    Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 17923832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical experience with Mercilon and Marvelon with special reference to ovarian function].
    Mall-Haefeli M; Werner-Zodrow I; Huber PR
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Jan; 51(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 1827418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A large observational clinical evaluation of a desogestrel-containing combiphasic oral contraceptive in Germany.
    Vree ML; Schmidt J
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2001 Jun; 6(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 11518448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuous oral contraceptives: are bleeding patterns dependent on the hormones given?
    Edelman AB; Koontz SL; Nichols MD; Jensen JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):657-65. PubMed ID: 16507938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Activity of the pituitary-ovarian axis in the pill-free interval during use of low-dose combined oral contraceptives.
    van Heusden AM; Fauser BC
    Contraception; 1999 Apr; 59(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 10457868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical study of two monophase oral contraceptives with desogestrel].
    Uchikova E; Milchev N; Markova D; Batashki I; Gŭrova A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 17469446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new ultra-low-dose combination oral contraceptive.
    Woutersz TB
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Jan; 28(1 Suppl):81-4. PubMed ID: 6403705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ovarian function with the contraceptive vaginal ring or an oral contraceptive: a randomized study.
    Duijkers IJ; Klipping C; Verhoeven CH; Dieben TO
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2668-73. PubMed ID: 15333593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical overview of a new triphasic contraceptive containing gestodene.
    Christie T
    Int J Fertil; 1989 Sep; 34 Suppl():40-9. PubMed ID: 2576257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of two low-dose oral contraceptives on pulsatile gonadotropin secretion.
    Schleussner E; Brueckner T; Brautigam J; Michels W
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2001 Aug; 15(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11560098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oral contraceptives containing 20 or 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic parameters.
    Jung-Hoffmann C; Fitzner M; Kuhl H
    Horm Res; 1991; 36(5-6):238-46. PubMed ID: 1823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter randomized comparative trial of two low-dose triphasic combined oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or norethindrone.
    Shoupe D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 83(5 Pt 1):679-85. PubMed ID: 8164925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cycle control and side effects of a new combiphasic oral contraceptive regimen.
    Dieben TO; op ten Berg MT; Coelingh Bennink HJ
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1994 Jul; 44(7):877-9. PubMed ID: 7945527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ovarian activity suppression by two different low-dose triphasic oral contraceptives.
    van der Does J; Exalto N; Dieben T; Bennink HC
    Contraception; 1995 Dec; 52(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 8749599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of cycle control and effect on well-being of monophasic gestodene-, triphasic gestodene- and monophasic desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives. Gestodene Study Group.
    Bruni V; Croxatto H; De La Cruz J; Dhont M; Durlot F; Fernandes MT; Andrade RP; Weisberg E; Rhoa M
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2000 Apr; 14(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 10836195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectivity and acceptability of oral contraceptives containing natural and artificial estrogens in combination with a gestagen. A controlled double-blind investigation.
    Serup J; Bostofte E; Larsen S; Westergaard J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1981; 60(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 7018165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The pharmacodynamic effects of an oral contraceptive containing 3 mg micronized 17 beta-estradiol and 0.150 mg desogestrel for 21 days, followed by 0.030 mg desogestrel only for 7 days.
    Csemiczky G; Dieben T; Coeling Bennink HJ; Landgren BM
    Contraception; 1996 Dec; 54(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 8968661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.