These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9480713)

  • 1. Sexual selection and the fitness consequences of male body size in the seed beetle Stator limbatus.
    Savalli UM; Fox CW
    Anim Behav; 1998 Feb; 55(2):473-83. PubMed ID: 9480713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mate choice and mate competition influence male body size in Japanese medaka.
    Howard RD; Martens RS; Innis SA; Drnevich JM; Hale J
    Anim Behav; 1998 May; 55(5):1151-63. PubMed ID: 9632501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Male inbreeding status affects female fitness in a seed-feeding beetle.
    Fox CW; Xu J; Wallin WG; Curtis CL
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Jan; 25(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 21995954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection on body size and sexual size dimorphism differs between host species in a seed-feeding beetle.
    Fox CW; Czesak ME
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1167-74. PubMed ID: 16780517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic variation in male effects on female reproduction and the genetic covariance between the sexes.
    Czesak ME; Fox CW
    Evolution; 2003 Jun; 57(6):1359-66. PubMed ID: 12894943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Male Age Affects Female Mate Preference, Quantity of Accessory Gland Proteins, and Sperm Traits and Female Fitness in D. melanogaster.
    Rezaei A; Krishna MS; Santhosh HT
    Zoolog Sci; 2015 Jan; 32(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 25660692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ejaculate investment and attractiveness in the stalk-eyed fly, Diasemopsis meigenii.
    Harley E; Birge LM; Small J; Tazzyman SJ; Pomiankowski A; Fowler K
    Ecol Evol; 2013 Jun; 3(6):1529-38. PubMed ID: 23789065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mate-guarding duration is mainly influenced by the risk of sperm competition and not by female quality in a golden orb-weaver spider.
    Del Matto LA; Macedo-Rego RC; Santos ESA
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12310. PubMed ID: 34733589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Male size does not affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lev A; Pischedda A
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1255-1265. PubMed ID: 37534751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrasting female mate preferences for red coloration in a fish.
    Reuland C; Culbert BM; Devigili A; Kahrl AF; Fitzpatrick JL
    Curr Zool; 2020 Aug; 66(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 32617091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-genetic benefits of mate choice: fecundity enhancement and sexy sons.
    M DK
    Anim Behav; 1998 May; 55(5):1191-201. PubMed ID: 9632504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of male age, sperm age and mating history on fecundity and fertilization success in the hide beetle.
    Jones TM; Elgar MA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Jun; 271(1545):1311-8. PubMed ID: 15306356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers.
    Zweerus NL; van Wijk M; Smallegange IM; Groot AT
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Apr; 12(4):e8864. PubMed ID: 35462973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection in an Insect With High Levels of Mating Failure.
    Balfour VL; Armand M; Shuker DM
    Ecol Evol; 2024 Oct; 14(10):e70407. PubMed ID: 39421326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection.
    Pitnick S; Miller GT; Reagan J; Holland B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 May; 268(1471):1071-80. PubMed ID: 11375092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male mate choice for large gravid spots in a livebearing fish.
    Ogden HJP; de Boer RA; Devigili A; Reuland C; Kahrl AF; Fitzpatrick JL
    Behav Ecol; 2020; 31(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 32372853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of size at metamorphosis on stonefly fecundity, longevity, and reproductive success.
    Taylor BW; Anderson CR; Peckarsky BL
    Oecologia; 1998 May; 114(4):494-502. PubMed ID: 28307898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Females receive a life-span benefit from male ejaculates in a field cricket.
    Wagner WE; Kelley RJ; Tucker KR; Harper CJ
    Evolution; 2001 May; 55(5):994-1001. PubMed ID: 11430659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SEXUAL SELECTION AND FITNESS VARIATION IN A POPULATION OF SMALLMOUTH BASS, MICROPTERUS DOLOMIEUI (PISCES: CENTRARCHIDAE).
    Wiegmann DD; Baylis JR; Hoff MH
    Evolution; 1992 Dec; 46(6):1740-1753. PubMed ID: 28567755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.