111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9482007)
1. Use of spiral computed tomography for multiplanar dental reconstruction.
Preda L; Di Maggio EM; Dore R; La Fianza A; Solcia M; Schifino MR; Campani R; Preda EG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Nov; 26(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 9482007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo, thyroid and lens surface exposure with spiral and conventional computed tomography in dental implant radiography.
Bianchi J; Goggins W; Rudolph M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Aug; 90(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 10936846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Complex maxillofacial trauma: diagnostic contribution of multiplanar and tridimensional spiral CT imaging].
Preda L; La Fianza A; Di Maggio EM; Dore R; Schifino MR; Mevio E; Campani R
Radiol Med; 1998 Sep; 96(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 9850708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Dental CT: image quality and radiation exposure in relation to scan parameters].
Schorn C; Visser H; Hermann KP; Alamo L; Funke M; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1999 Feb; 170(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10101352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Denta Scan: CT software program used in the anatomic evaluation of the mandible and maxilla in the perspective of endosseous implant surgery.
Casselman JW; Deryckere F; Hermans R; Declercq C; Neyt L; Pattyn G; Meeus L; Vandevoorde P; Steyaert L; Devos V
Rofo; 1991 Jul; 155(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 1854934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of spiral computed tomography for dental implants.
Cavalcanti MG; Yang J; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):329-33. PubMed ID: 10895630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of computerized tomography for the evaluation of mandibular sites prior to implant placement.
Sforza NM; Franchini F; Lamma A; Botticelli S; Ghigi G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Dec; 27(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 18092453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of preimplant low-dose tomography.
Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Dec; 88(6):738-44. PubMed ID: 10625858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT.
Draenert FG; Coppenrath E; Herzog P; Müller S; Mueller-Lisse UG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 17536086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of dose reduction on multi-detector computed tomographic images in evaluating the maxilla and mandible for pre-surgical implant planning: a cadaveric study.
Koizumi H; Sur J; Seki K; Nakajima K; Sano T; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):830-4. PubMed ID: 20666797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant radiography.
Friedland B
J Mass Dent Soc; 2003; 51(4):14-7. PubMed ID: 12677638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of various parameters (pitch 1 and 2) in the study of the lung with spiral computerized tomography].
Sartoni Galloni S; Miceli M; Lipparini M; Burzi M; Gigli F; Rossi MS; Santoli G; Guidarelli G
Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 10363051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use.
Watanabe H; Honda E; Tetsumura A; Kurabayashi T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 19819091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Work in progress.
Rothman SL; Chaftez N; Rhodes ML; Schwarz MS
Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 3380955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of spiral computed tomography in the localization of impacted maxillary canines.
Preda L; La Fianza A; Di Maggio EM; Dore R; Schifino MR; Campani R; Segù C; Sfondrini MF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):236-41. PubMed ID: 9442615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast and Accurate Semiautomatic Segmentation of Individual Teeth from Dental CT Images.
Kang HC; Choi C; Shin J; Lee J; Shin YG
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():810796. PubMed ID: 26413143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-dose tomographic techniques for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl K; Ekholm S; Johansson PE; Gröndahl HG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(5):650-9. PubMed ID: 8908865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography.
Cavalcanti MG; Yang J; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 10740466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
