These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9482009)

  • 1. Impact of scale standardization on images of digital radiography systems.
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Nov; 26(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 9482009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction in size of digital images: does it lead to less detectability or loss of diagnostic information?
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; Lobach SR; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 9656873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms.
    Li G; Sanderink GC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Näsström K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15140815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length.
    Oliveira ML; Ambrosano GM; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Tosoni GM
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21276021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
    Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film.
    Cederberg RA; Tidwell E; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 9540092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
    Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loss of diagnostic information in digital images.
    Molteni R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):312. PubMed ID: 9890795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of ambient light and bit depth of digital radiograph on observer performance in determination of endodontic file positioning.
    Heo MS; Han DH; An BM; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 17604662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An ex vivo comparison of conventional and digital radiography for perceived image quality of root fillings.
    Akdeniz BG; Soğur E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 15910475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems.
    Berkhout WE; Verheij JG; Syriopoulos K; Li G; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):204-10. PubMed ID: 17536087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors.
    Athar A; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO; Williams KB; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 18718798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of high-resolution digital imaging technology for small diameter K-file length determination in endodontics.
    Vandenberghe B; Bud M; Sutanto A; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 19452176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gray value differences to dentin of root posts radiographed with digital intraoral systems and conventional X-ray films.
    Wicht S; Pfeiffer P; Rother U; Nergiz I; Schmage P
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 21488726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
    Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of data compression on proximal caries detection: observer performance with DenOptix photostimulable phosphor images.
    Pabla T; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Abreu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12820853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs.
    Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 9103793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnostic consistency for observing endodontic files in digital radiographs displayed on different electronic devices].
    Liu R; Li G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 57(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 35368164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.