These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9482021)

  • 1. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):166-8. PubMed ID: 9735460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The OP 100 Digipan: evaluation of the image layer, magnification factors, and dosimetry.
    Farman TT; Kelly MS; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 9117762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
    Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
    Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Wyatt J; Van Dam J; Nowak B; Jacobs R
    Br Dent J; 2004 Aug; 197(3):149-52; discussion 140. PubMed ID: 15311250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.
    Dula K; Sanderink G; van der Stelt PF; Mini R; Buser D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 9720100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system.
    Farrier SL; Drage NA; Newcombe RG; Hayes SJ; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 19548931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
    Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24404601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitometric effects of varying the intensifying screens used with Agfa Dentus ST8G and RP6 panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kitagawa H; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9442613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of the resolution of a digital system for panoramic radiography based on CCD technology.
    Mastoris M; Li G; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Mar; 97(3):408-14. PubMed ID: 15024369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of image characteristics and convenience in panoramic radiography using charge-coupled device, storage phosphor, and film receptors.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):48-51. PubMed ID: 11442119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical trial of panoramic dental radiography using a CCD receptor.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):169-71. PubMed ID: 9735461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.