These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9484051)

  • 1. The effect of tooth preparation height and diameter on the resistance of complete crowns to fatigue loading.
    Wiskott HW; Nicholls JI; Belser UC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 9484051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between abutment taper and resistance of cemented crowns to dynamic loading.
    Wiskott HW; Nicholls JI; Belser UC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):117-39. PubMed ID: 8639233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of film thickness and surface texture on the resistance of cemented extracoronal restorations to lateral fatigue loading.
    Wiskott HW; Belser UC; Scherrer SS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 10635194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.
    Ohlmann B; Gruber R; Eickemeyer G; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18762033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns.
    Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):354-61. PubMed ID: 19961993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of luting cements for minimally retentive crown preparations.
    Browning WD; Nelson SK; Cibirka R; Myers ML
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb; 33(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 11890033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system.
    Clayton GH; Driscoll CF; Hondrum SO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 9337028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of different cementation modes on the fracture resistance of feldspathic ceramic crowns.
    Groten M; Pröbster L
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 9206458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.