144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9484057)
1. The effect of displacement time on gingival crevice width.
Baharav H; Laufer BZ; Langer Y; Cardash HS
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 9484057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The closure of the gingival crevice following gingival retraction for impression making.
Laufer BZ; Baharav H; Langer Y; Cardash HS
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):629-35. PubMed ID: 9357742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.
Chandra S; Singh A; Gupta KK; Chandra C; Arora V
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26443067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose-related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction.
Csillag M; Nyiri G; Vag J; Fazekas A
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17280885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Three-dimensional model analysis of the gingival sulcus width from different retraction time].
Zhang Jj; Liu Yh; Lv Pj; Zhao Yj
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Feb; 43(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 21321624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of different retraction techniques on crevicular fluid flow.
Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):215-6. PubMed ID: 18548958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords.
Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12589285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using the double-cord packing technique of tissue retraction for making crown impressions.
Cloyd S; Puri S
Dent Today; 1999 Jan; 18(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10765795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of gingival retraction procedures on periodontal indices and crevicular fluid cytokine levels: a pilot study.
Feng J; Aboyoussef H; Weiner S; Singh S; Jandinski J
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 16650011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of the carbon dioxide laser on the clinical parameters and crevicular IL-1beta when used as an adjunct to gingival flap surgery.
Choi KH; Im SU; Kim CS; Choi SH; Kim CK
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2004 Jan; 6(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 14964492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health.
Al Hamad KQ; Azar WZ; Alwaeli HA; Said KN
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Dec; 35(12):1053-8. PubMed ID: 19040582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow.
Polat NT; Ozdemir AK; Turgut M
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17319365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current concepts in gingival displacement.
Donovan TE; Chee WW
Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vi, 433-44. PubMed ID: 15172609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified custom tray.
Ortensi L; Strocchi ML
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 10946346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of an erbium laser in lieu of retraction cord: a modern technique.
Scott A
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 15833012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
