These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9484062)

  • 1. Implant-supported telescopic restorations in maxillofacial prosthetics.
    Weischer T; Schettler D; Mohr C
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 9484062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of prosthetic restorations on bone-lock implants in patients after oral tumor resection.
    Kovács AF
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 9835838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ten-year experience in oral implant rehabilitation of cancer patients: treatment concept and proposed criteria for success.
    Weischer T; Mohr C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 10453667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implant-supported mandibular telescopic prostheses in oral cancer patients: an up to 9-year retrospective study.
    Weischer T; Mohr C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 11508087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of a microvascular reconstructed mandible using an implant-supported overdenture: case report.
    Dominici JT
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 8699524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concept of surgical and implant-supported prostheses in the rehabilitation of patients with oral cancer.
    Weischer T; Schettler D; Mohr C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):775-81. PubMed ID: 8990640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
    Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report.
    Krennmair G; Ulm C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 11280368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
    Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
    Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removable prosthesis supported by implants according to the Cagliari modified conometry technique: case report.
    Caruso G; Cattaneo A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Jun; 27(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 17694949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieving cemented telescopic prostheses: technical note.
    Gittleman NB
    Implant Dent; 1996; 5(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 9081580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment options for the edentulous mandible: clinical application of the two-implant overdenture.
    Carpentieri J
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Mar; 16(2):105-12; quiz 114. PubMed ID: 15112396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible.
    Zitzmann NU; Marinello CP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11887602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Telescopic crowns as attachments for implant supported restorations: a case series.
    Hoffmann O; Beaumont C; Tatakis DN; Zafiropoulos GG
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(6):291-9. PubMed ID: 17193931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjustments and complications of mandibular overdentures retained by four implants. A comparison between superstructures with and without cantilever extensions.
    den Dunnen AC; Slagter AP; de Baat C; Kalk W
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 9758993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.