These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9484134)

  • 1. Marginal ridge fracture resistance, microleakage and pulpal response to glass ionomer/glass cermet partial tunnel restorations.
    Prabhu NT; Munshi AK; Shetty TR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9484134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tunnel restorations using glass ionomer or glass cermet: in vitro marginal ridge fracture and microleakage.
    Shetty R; Munshi AK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 9161212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal ridge strength in Class II tunnel restorations.
    Fasbinder DJ; Davis RD; Burgess JO
    Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 1854444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compressive fracture resistance of the marginal ridge in large Class II tunnels restored with cermet and composite resin.
    Ehrnford LE; Fransson H
    Swed Dent J; 1994; 18(5):207-11. PubMed ID: 7871480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro assessment of cavity margin finishing and marginal adaptation of tunnel restorations.
    Chalker SA; Lumley PJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Jun; 1(4):151-6. PubMed ID: 8268839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glass ionomer-silver cermet bonded composite resin Class II tunnel restorations.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Aug; 19(8):533-9. PubMed ID: 2978627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of Class 2 glass-ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars.
    Fuks AB; Holan G; Simon H; Lewinstein I
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 1437689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Class II Tunnel restorations of glass-ionomer-silver-Cermet cement and composite].
    Croll TP
    Quintessenz; 1989 Sep; 40(9):1577-88. PubMed ID: 2517954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal ridge strength of teeth with tunnel preparations.
    Strand GV; Tveit AB; Gjerdet NR; Eide GE
    Int Dent J; 1995 Apr; 45(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 7558348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glass ionomer cement restorations: the effects of lasing the cavity walls on marginal microleakage.
    Liberman R; Eli I; Imber S; Shlezinger I
    Clin Prev Dent; 1990; 12(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 2376107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
    Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.