These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9484162)

  • 1. The effect of a training program on the reliability of examiners evaluating amalgam restorations.
    Robertello FJ; Pink FE
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(2):57-65. PubMed ID: 9484162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Student and faculty perceptions in the assessment of amalgam restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2000; 80(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 11324025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of a short training program on the clinical examination of dental restorations.
    McAndrew R; Chadwick B; Treasure ET
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 21702675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Substitution of amalgam restorations: participative training to standardize criteria.
    Fernandes ET; Ferreira e Ferreira E
    Braz Oral Res; 2004; 18(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 15619880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two methods for evaluating the occlusal marginal adaptation of posterior restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ; Akerboom HB
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):304-9. PubMed ID: 8258574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving evaluation of amalgam restorations.
    Salvendy G; Joost MG; Cunningham PR; Ferguson GW; Wilko RA; Dees RW
    J Dent Educ; 1976 Jun; 40(6):368-9. PubMed ID: 1063780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examiner agreement in the replacement decision of Class I amalgam restorations.
    Ermis RB; Aydin U
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 15150636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The amalgam-free dental school.
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra- and inter-examiner variability in evaluating preclinical pediatric dentistry operative procedures.
    Sharaf AA; AbdelAziz AM; El Meligy OA
    J Dent Educ; 2007 Apr; 71(4):540-4. PubMed ID: 17468316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rater reliability: short- and long-term effects of calibration training.
    Haj-Ali R; Feil P
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Apr; 70(4):428-33. PubMed ID: 16595535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of differences in amalgam restorations on examination standardization.
    Cobb DS
    J Dent Educ; 1997 Dec; 61(12):938-40. PubMed ID: 9457136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry.
    McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 71(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 15955263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Variations among dentists in the diagnosis of caries and assessment of dental restorations].
    Poorterman JH; Verheij JG; Kieft JA; Eijkman MA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Jun; 104(6):214-8. PubMed ID: 11923916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization.
    Gehrke P; Lobert M; Dhom G
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(6):375-84; discussion 385. PubMed ID: 19120783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing a multistage rating scale for clinical evaluation of all-ceramic surfaces.
    Schmitt J; Holst S; Wichmann M; Gollner M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 22146258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operative dentistry: the missing clinical standards.
    Lutz FU; Krejci I; Besek M
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1997; 9(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 9550080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations.
    Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.