These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations. Gordan VV; Vargas MA; Cobb DS; Denehy GE Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 9863445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Marginal adaptation of Class 5 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel and dentin bonding. Farid MR; Gomaa HM Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1271-5. PubMed ID: 9497668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of a resin lining and rebonding on the marginal leakage of amalgam restorations. Dutton FB; Summitt JB; Chan DC; Garcia-Godoy F J Dent; 1993 Feb; 21(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8425985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microleakage of cervical restorations etched with a weak organic acid. Owens BM J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Jun; 63(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 9203777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microleakage of composite restorations with Syntac Bond and Denthesive. Saunders WP; Muirhead JM Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):255-7. PubMed ID: 1299251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microleakage of Class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study. St Georges AJ; Wilder AD; Perdigão J; Swift EJ Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 12572642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microleakage of Class II posterior composite restorations with gingival margins placed entirely within dentin. Stockton LW; Tsang ST J Can Dent Assoc; 2007 Apr; 73(3):255. PubMed ID: 17439712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin. Owens BM; Halter TK; Brown DM Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 9728146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microleakage of multi-step and simplified-step bonding systems. Castelnuovo J; Tjan AH; Liu P Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):245-8. PubMed ID: 9545877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage. Aranha AC; Pimenta LA Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Barkmeier WW; Los SA; Triolo PT Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):289-93. PubMed ID: 8695004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations using different solvent-based bonding agents and methods of drying acid-etched dentin. Santini A Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):194-200. PubMed ID: 10649927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microleakage of bonding agents with wet and dry bonding techniques. Saunders WP; Saunders EM Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 9002813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microleakage evaluation of four self-etching adhesive systems. Kirk PC; Fitchie JG; Phillips SM; Puckett AD Gen Dent; 2010; 58(3):e104-9. PubMed ID: 20478786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]