91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9484250)
1. Screening for cervical cancer.
Clarke EA
CMAJ; 1998 Feb; 158(3):301-2. PubMed ID: 9484250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time trends in cervical cancer screening rates in the OECD countries.
Machii R; Saito H
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2011 May; 41(5):731-2. PubMed ID: 21536695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and cost implications of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: the impact of test sensitivity.
Hutchinson ML; Berger BM; Farber FL
Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):766-80. PubMed ID: 11067374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Belgium: do not forget about cervical cancer screening.
Thiry N; De Laet C; Hulstaert F; Neyt M; Huybrechts M; Cleemput I
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 19366497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Efficacy of organized screening in comparison to spontaneous Pap samples in the prevention of invasive cervical cancer].
Kallio M; Nieminen P; Anttila A; Hakama M
Duodecim; 2001; 117(14):1442-6. PubMed ID: 12181953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening the only option to prevent cervical cancer.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2005; 44(159):I. PubMed ID: 16554856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Creating favorable conditions for organized screening of cervical cancer].
Baudier F
Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():5-10. PubMed ID: 10989624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. ["Cost-effectiveness" of cervical screening].
Kostova P
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 17974169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries.
Sankaranarayanan R; Budukh AM; Rajkumar R
Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(10):954-62. PubMed ID: 11693978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.
Kesić V; Jovićević-Bekić A; Vujnović M
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():31-6. PubMed ID: 17598502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cervical cancer prevention: the impact of HPV vaccination].
Monsonégo J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Mar; 34(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 16529969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency of cervical cancer screening by age group, 2000.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(12):879. PubMed ID: 12072540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
Reust CE
J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Preventing cervical cancer : overviews of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program and 2 US immunization programs.
Khan K; Curtis CR; Ekwueme DU; Stokley S; Walker C; Roland K; Benard V; Saraiya M
Cancer; 2008 Nov; 113(10 Suppl):3004-12. PubMed ID: 18980296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Every encounter is an opportunity for recommending breast and cervical cancer screening in women. Alaska Breast & Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Alaska Med; 2000; 42(2):46-7. PubMed ID: 10916858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Geographic & age variations in invasive cervical cancer in Kentucky, 1995-1999.
Wyatt S; Ross FE; Bottorff D; Lancaster M
J Ky Med Assoc; 2002 Oct; 100(10):441-6. PubMed ID: 12395746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
