109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9484540)
1. Selection of subtle cases for observer-performance studies: the importance of knowing the true diagnosis.
Rockette HE; King JL; Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Slifko RM; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1998 Feb; 5(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 9484540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.
Herron JM; Bender TM; Campbell WL; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Gur D
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 10751483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of image processing on chest radiograph interpretation and decision changes.
Krupinski EA; Evanoff M; Ovitt T; Standen JR; Chu TX; Johnson J
Acad Radiol; 1998 Feb; 5(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 9484539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ROC Curve for Extremely Subtle Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs Confirmed by CT Scan.
Shang H; Jiang Y; Li F; MacMahon H; Wang J
Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 26774737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An ROC study of chest radiographs: 2K Versus 4K high-resolution soft-copy images.
Kim SY; Hwang YJ; Han YH; Seo JW; Lee JY; Kim YH; Cha SJ; Hur G; Lee SS
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Dec; 20(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 17191100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observer performance studies: detection of single versus multiple abnormalities of the chest.
Fuhrman CR; Britton CA; Bender T; Sumkin JH; Brown ML; Holbert JM; Chang TS; Rockette HE; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1551-3. PubMed ID: 12438053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deep learning-based detection system for multiclass lesions on chest radiographs: comparison with observer readings.
Park S; Lee SM; Lee KH; Jung KH; Bae W; Choe J; Seo JB
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1359-1368. PubMed ID: 31748854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs.
Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Meiss L; Peters-Bax L; Quekel LG; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2399-405. PubMed ID: 24113431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: effect of 4K versus 2K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities.
Ueguchi T; Johkoh T; Tomiyama N; Honda O; Mihara N; Hamada S; Murai S; Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Nakamura H
Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 15940063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reader variance in ROC studies--generalizability to reader population at high and low performance levels.
Gur D; Bandos AI; Klym AH; Rockette HE
Acad Radiol; 2006 Aug; 13(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16843853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization.
Li F; Hara T; Shiraishi J; Engelmann R; MacMahon H; Doi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W535-41. PubMed ID: 21512042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved detection of lung nodules by using a temporal subtraction technique.
Kakeda S; Nakamura K; Kamada K; Watanabe H; Nakata H; Katsuragawa S; Doi K
Radiology; 2002 Jul; 224(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 12091674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Report on the 90th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America-- Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis].
Ikeda R; Katsuragawa S; Shimonobou T; Hashida M; Yamashita Y; Doi K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):974-5. PubMed ID: 16049406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Solitary pulmonary nodule diagnosis on CT: results of an observer study.
Shah SK; McNitt-Gray MF; De Zoysa KR; Sayre JW; Kim HJ; Batra P; Behrashi A; Brown K; Greaser LE; Park JM; Roback DK; Wu C; Zaragoza E; Goldin JG; Suh RD; Brown MS; Aberle DR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 15831424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observer variation and the performance accuracy gained by averaging ratings of abnormality.
Swensson RG; King JL; Good WF; Gur D
Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1920-33. PubMed ID: 10984238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of observer instruction on ROC study of chest images.
Gur D; Rockette HE; Good WF; Slasky BS; Cooperstein LA; Straub WH; Obuchowski NA; Metz CE
Invest Radiol; 1990 Mar; 25(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 2332308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
