162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9484754)
1. Utility of standardized histological classification in the management of acute rejection. 1995 Efficacy Endpoints Conference.
Gaber LW; Moore LW; Gaber AO; First MR; Guttmann RD; Pouletty P; Schroeder TJ; Soulillou JP
Transplantation; 1998 Feb; 65(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 9484754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy Endpoints Conference on Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: summary report of the database.
Schroeder TJ; Moore LW
Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 Jun; 31(6 Suppl 1):S31-9. PubMed ID: 9631862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of clinical outcomes after tacrolimus conversion for resistant kidney rejection or cyclosporine toxicity with pathologic staging by the Banff criteria.
Morrissey PE; Gohh R; Shaffer D; Crosson A; Madras PN; Sahyoun AI; Monaco AP
Transplantation; 1997 Mar; 63(6):845-8. PubMed ID: 9089224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Banff schema for grading liver allograft rejection: utility in clinical practice.
Ormonde DG; de Boer WB; Kierath A; Bell R; Shilkin KB; House AK; Jeffrey GP; Reed WD
Liver Transpl Surg; 1999 Jul; 5(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 10388498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of the Banff classification of early renal allograft biopsies and correlation with outcome.
Bates WD; Davies DR; Welsh K; Gray DW; Fuggle SV; Morris PJ
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 Oct; 14(10):2364-9. PubMed ID: 10528659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A blinded retrospective analysis of renal allograft pathology using the Banff schema: implications for clinical management.
Dean DE; Kamath S; Peddi VR; Schroeder TJ; First MR; Cavallo T
Transplantation; 1999 Sep; 68(5):642-5. PubMed ID: 10507482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observations on recovery of renal function following treatment for acute rejection.
Gaber AO; Moore LW; Schroeder TJ
Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 Jun; 31(6 Suppl 1):S47-59. PubMed ID: 9631864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposed consensus for definitions and endpoints for clinical trials of acute kidney transplant rejection.
Guttmann RD; Soulillou JP; Moore LW; First MR; Gaber AO; Pouletty P; Schroeder TJ
Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 Jun; 31(6 Suppl 1):S40-6. PubMed ID: 9631863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of renal transplant histology at three months.
Kuypers DR; Chapman JR; O'Connell PJ; Allen RD; Nankivell BJ
Transplantation; 1999 May; 67(9):1222-30. PubMed ID: 10342313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between Banff classification, acute renal rejection scores and reversal of rejection.
Gaber LW; Moore LW; Alloway RR; Flax SD; Shokouh-Amiri MH; Schroder T; Gaber AO
Kidney Int; 1996 Feb; 49(2):481-7. PubMed ID: 8821833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The correlation of Banff scoring with reversibility of first and recurrent rejection episodes.
Gaber LW; Schroeder TJ; Moore LW; Shakouh-Amiri MH; Gaber AO
Transplantation; 1996 Jun; 61(12):1711-5. PubMed ID: 8685948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Current topics of the rejection pathology in human renal allografts].
Morozumi K; Fukuda M; Takeda A
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1998 May; 44(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 9656109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the Banff '97 classification for histological diagnosis of rejection on clinical outcome and renal function parameters after kidney transplantation.
Mueller A; Schnuelle P; Waldherr R; van der Woude FJ
Transplantation; 2000 Mar; 69(6):1123-7. PubMed ID: 10762217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of the Banff borderline biopsy.
Schweitzer EJ; Drachenberg CB; Anderson L; Papadimetriou JC; Kuo PC; Johnson LB; Klassen DK; Hoehn-Saric E; Weir MR; Bartlett ST
Am J Kidney Dis; 1996 Oct; 28(4):585-8. PubMed ID: 8840950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Based on the 2013 Banff Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Uruguay.
Nin M; Coitiño R; Kurdian M; Orihuela L; Astesiano R; Garau M; López D; Rievas G; Rodriguez I; González-Martínez F; Noboa O
Transplant Proc; 2016 Mar; 48(2):612-5. PubMed ID: 27110014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative assessment of the first acute rejection as a predictor of renal transplant outcome.
Ishikawa A; Flechner SM; Goldfarb DA; Myles JL; Modlin CS; Boparai N; Papajcik D; Mastroianni B; Novick AC
Transplantation; 1999 Nov; 68(9):1318-24. PubMed ID: 10573070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Renal allograft rejection in children and young adults: the Banff classification.
Corey HE; Greenstein SM; Tellis V; Schechner R; Greifer I; Bennett B
Pediatr Nephrol; 1995 Jun; 9(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 7543274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Banff criteria as predictors of outcome following acute renal allograft rejection.
Macdonald FI; Ashraf S; Picton M; Dyer PA; Parrott NR; Short CD; Roberts IS
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 Jul; 14(7):1692-7. PubMed ID: 10435878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Banff criteria for acute rejection in renal transplant biopsies.
Dittmer ID; Zwi LJ; Collins JF
Aust N Z J Med; 1995 Dec; 25(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 8770331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting factors of long-term results of OKT3 therapy for steroid resistant acute rejection following cadaveric renal transplantation.
Rostaing L; Chabannier MH; Modesto A; Rouzaud A; Cisterne JM; Tkaczuk J; Durand D
Am J Nephrol; 1999; 19(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 10592356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
