BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9485139)

  • 21. Systematic comparisons of electrocardiographic morphology increase the precision of QT interval measurement.
    Hnatkova K; Smetana P; Toman O; Bauer A; Schmidt G; Malik M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 19140922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Usefulness of surface electrocardiogram in predicting the clinical course of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Bayrak F; Kahveci G; Mutlu B; Değertekin M; Demirtaş E
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2007 Jul; 7 Suppl 1():178-81. PubMed ID: 17584718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determinants of precordial QT dispersion in normal subjects.
    Lee KW; Kligfield P; Okin PM; Dower GE
    J Electrocardiol; 1998; 31 Suppl():128-33. PubMed ID: 9988017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving the precision of QT measurements.
    Darpo B; Fossa AA; Couderc JP; Zhou M; Schreyer A; Ticktin M; Zapesochny A
    Cardiol J; 2011; 18(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21769821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adjustment of QT dispersion assessed from 12 lead electrocardiograms for different numbers of analysed electrocardiographic leads: comparison of stability of different methods.
    Hnatkova K; Malik M; Kautzner J; Gang Y; Camm AJ
    Br Heart J; 1994 Oct; 72(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 7833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Precision of QT interval measurement by advanced electrocardiographic equipment.
    Hnatkova K; Gang Y; Batchvarov VN; Malik M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 29(11):1277-84. PubMed ID: 17100684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of premature ventricular beats on manual and automatic repolarization measurements.
    Vecchietti S; Langley P; Severi S; Cavalcanti S; Murray A
    J Electrocardiol; 2004 Jul; 37(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 15286931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of lead exclusion for the manual measurement of QT dispersion.
    Langley P; Di Bernardo D; Murray A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 11227974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measurement and interpretation of QT dispersion.
    Batchvarov V; Malik M
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2000; 42(5):325-44. PubMed ID: 10768311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measurement, interpretation and clinical potential of QT dispersion.
    Malik M; Batchvarov VN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 36(6):1749-66. PubMed ID: 11092641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. T wave complexity in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Yi G; Prasad K; Elliott P; Sharma S; Guo X; McKenna WJ; Malik M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 2):2382-6. PubMed ID: 9825352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two automatic QT algorithms compared with manual measurement in identification of long QT syndrome.
    Diamant UB; Winbo A; Stattin EL; Rydberg A; Kesek M; Jensen SM
    J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20005993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [A method for measuring QT and T duration and beat to beat variability].
    Neupert H; Voss A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Apr; 42(4):85-9. PubMed ID: 9235114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. QT dispersion and left ventricular morphology in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Sakata K; Shimizu M; Ino H; Yamaguchi M; Terai H; Hayashi K; Kiyama M; Hayashi T; Inoue M; Mabuchi H
    Heart; 2003 Aug; 89(8):882-6. PubMed ID: 12860864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Algorithms for computerized QT analysis.
    Xue Q; Reddy S
    J Electrocardiol; 1998; 30 Suppl():181-6. PubMed ID: 9535497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short-term beat-to-beat variability of the QT interval is increased and correlates with parameters of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Orosz A; Baczkó I; Nagy V; Gavallér H; Csanády M; Forster T; Papp JG; Varró A; Lengyel C; Sepp R
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015 Sep; 93(9):765-72. PubMed ID: 26313025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of automatic repolarization measurement techniques in the normal magnetocardiogram.
    Smith FE; Langley P; Trahms L; Steinhoff U; Bourke JP; Murray A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Nov; 26(11):2096-102. PubMed ID: 14622310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Weighing the QT intervals with the slope or the amplitude of the T wave.
    Lund K; Nygaard H; Kirstein Pedersen A
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2002 Jan; 7(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 11844285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fetal QT Interval Estimation Using Sequential Hypothesis Testing.
    Yu S; Van Veen BD; Lutter WJ; Wakai RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2704-2710. PubMed ID: 28182551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intra- and interreader variability in QT interval measurement by tangent and threshold methods in a central electrocardiogram laboratory.
    Panicker GK; Karnad DR; Natekar M; Kothari S; Narula D; Lokhandwala Y
    J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 19261293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.