BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9485491)

  • 1. Assessment of comparative modeling in CASP2.
    Martin AC; MacArthur MW; Thornton JM
    Proteins; 1997; Suppl 1():14-28. PubMed ID: 9485491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of side-chain packing methods in modeling bacteriophage repressor and cro proteins.
    Chung SY; Subbiah S
    Protein Sci; 1995 Nov; 4(11):2300-9. PubMed ID: 8563626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of comparative modeling predictions for CASP2 targets 1, 3, 9, and 17.
    Harrison RW; Reed CC; Weber IT
    Proteins; 1997; Suppl 1():68-73. PubMed ID: 9485497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How similar must a template protein be for homology modeling by side-chain packing methods?
    Chung SY; Subbiah S
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 1996; ():126-41. PubMed ID: 9390228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating local backbone structural deviation in homology models.
    Cardozo T; Batalov S; Abagyan R
    Comput Chem; 2000 Jan; 24(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 10642877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Homology modeling with internal coordinate mechanics: deformation zone mapping and improvements of models via conformational search.
    Abagyan R; Batalov S; Cardozo T; Totrov M; Webber J; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 1997; Suppl 1():29-37. PubMed ID: 9485492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility.
    Schueler-Furman O; Wang C; Baker D
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15981249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta.
    Rohl CA; Strauss CE; Chivian D; Baker D
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(3):656-77. PubMed ID: 15103629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model building by comparison: a combination of expert knowledge and computer automation.
    Bates PA; Jackson RM; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 1997; Suppl 1():59-67. PubMed ID: 9485496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can molecular dynamics simulations help in discriminating correct from erroneous protein 3D models?
    Taly JF; Marin A; Gibrat JF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():6. PubMed ID: 18179702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.
    Jacobson MP; Pincus DL; Rapp CS; Day TJ; Honig B; Shaw DE; Friesner RA
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(2):351-67. PubMed ID: 15048827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein structure prediction of CASP5 comparative modeling and fold recognition targets using consensus alignment approach and 3D assessment.
    Ginalski K; Rychlewski L
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():410-7. PubMed ID: 14579329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative modeling of CASP3 targets using PSI-BLAST and SCWRL.
    Dunbrack RL
    Proteins; 1999; Suppl 3():81-7. PubMed ID: 10526356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antibody structure determination using a combination of homology modeling, energy-based refinement, and loop prediction.
    Zhu K; Day T; Warshaviak D; Murrett C; Friesner R; Pearlman D
    Proteins; 2014 Aug; 82(8):1646-55. PubMed ID: 24619874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving amino-acid identification, fit and C(alpha) prediction using the Simplex method in automated model building.
    Romo TD; Sacchettini JC; Ioerger TR
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2006 Nov; 62(Pt 11):1401-6. PubMed ID: 17057345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Homology modeling by the ICM method.
    Cardozo T; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Proteins; 1995 Nov; 23(3):403-14. PubMed ID: 8710833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment.
    John B; Sali A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2003 Jul; 31(14):3982-92. PubMed ID: 12853614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating quality of template-based protein models by alignment stability.
    Chen H; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1255-74. PubMed ID: 18041762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consensus alignment for reliable framework prediction in homology modeling.
    Prasad JC; Comeau SR; Vajda S; Camacho CJ
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Sep; 19(13):1682-91. PubMed ID: 12967965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative modeling of CASP4 target proteins: combining results of sequence search with three-dimensional structure assessment.
    Venclovas C
    Proteins; 2001; Suppl 5():47-54. PubMed ID: 11835481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.