These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9486647)

  • 1. Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task.
    Hackley SA; Valle-Inclán F
    Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6669):786-8. PubMed ID: 9486647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Intersensory facilitation: also concomitant visual stimuli can decrease reaction time].
    Dufft CC; Ulrich R
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 10067137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Centrifugal regulation of human cortical responses to a task-relevant somatosensory signal triggering voluntary movement.
    Kida T; Wasaka T; Inui K; Akatsuka K; Nakata H; Kakigi R
    Neuroimage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):1355-64. PubMed ID: 16806987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand.
    Gladwin TE; Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 16169147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Specific task anticipation versus unspecific orienting reaction during early contingent negative variation.
    Bender S; Resch F; Weisbrod M; Oelkers-Ax R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Aug; 115(8):1836-45. PubMed ID: 15261862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modality-independent processes in cued motor preparation revealed by cortical potentials.
    Diaconescu AO; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1255-65. PubMed ID: 18625564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The relationship between achievement of a simple movement and changes in the individual components of an evoked potential].
    Zalkind MS; Koz'mian EI; Naĭdel' AV
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1975 Apr; 61(4):518-29. PubMed ID: 1213175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction of sound and sight during action perception: evidence for shared modality-dependent action representations.
    Alaerts K; Swinnen SP; Wenderoth N
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2593-9. PubMed ID: 19463837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of aging on slowing of motor-response generation.
    Falkenstein M; Yordanova J; Kolev V
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 16257076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No evidence for a late locus of task switch effects.
    Fiedler A; Schröter H; Ulrich R
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():74-80. PubMed ID: 19100725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-time tracking of motor response activation and response competition in a Stroop task in young children: a lateralized readiness potential study.
    Szucs D; Soltész F; Bryce D; Whitebread D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2195-206. PubMed ID: 19296726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatiotemporal tuning of motor cortical neurons for hand position and velocity.
    Paninski L; Fellows MR; Hatsopoulos NG; Donoghue JP
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jan; 91(1):515-32. PubMed ID: 13679402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preparation of response force and movement direction: onset effects on the lateralized readiness potential.
    Müller-Gethmann H; Rinkenauer G; Stahl J; Ulrich R
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jul; 37(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 10934909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. OSP parameters and the cognitive component of reaction time to a missing stimulus: linking brain and behavior.
    Hernández OH; Vogel-Sprott M
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 19501943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis.
    Jepma M; Wagenmakers EJ; Band GP; Nieuwenhuis S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):847-64. PubMed ID: 18702584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning.
    Garry MI; Kamen G; Nordstrom MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 91(4):1570-8. PubMed ID: 14627660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Movement-related EEG indices of preparation in task switching and motor control.
    de Jong R; Gladwin TE; 't Hart BM
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 16630582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological correlates of interval timing in the Stop-Reaction-Time task.
    Penney TB
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):234-49. PubMed ID: 15464355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.