These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9487093)
1. Adequacy of required regulatory hazard testing for the detection of potential hormonal activity of crop protection chemicals. Stevens JT; Gfeller W; Machemer L; Leist KH J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 1998; 1(1):59-79. PubMed ID: 9487093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status. Box RJ; Spielmann H Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening chemicals for thyroid-disrupting activity: A critical comparison of mammalian and amphibian models. Pickford DB Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Nov; 40(10):845-92. PubMed ID: 20684730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The adrenal cortex and steroidogenesis as cellular and molecular targets for toxicity: critical omissions from regulatory endocrine disrupter screening strategies for human health? Harvey PW; Everett DJ J Appl Toxicol; 2003; 23(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 12666151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental effect assessment for sexual endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Fish testing strategy. Knacker T; Boettcher M; Frische T; Rufli H; Stolzenberg HC; Teigeler M; Zok S; Braunbeck T; Schäfers C Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):653-62. PubMed ID: 20872646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products. Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 4():1-82. PubMed ID: 19101832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. OECD test strategies and methods for endocrine disruptors. Gelbke HP; Kayser M; Poole A Toxicology; 2004 Dec; 205(1-2):17-25. PubMed ID: 15458786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk assessment of 'endocrine substances': guidance on identifying endocrine disruptors. Lewis RW Toxicol Lett; 2013 Dec; 223(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 24036001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH). Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk assessment of endocrine active chemicals: identifying chemicals of regulatory concern. Bars R; Fegert I; Gross M; Lewis D; Weltje L; Weyers A; Wheeler JR; Galay-Burgos M Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Oct; 64(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 22735369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The mouse carcinogenicity study is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides. Billington R; Lewis RW; Mehta JM; Dewhurst I Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 40(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 20144135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative overview of current international strategies and guidelines for genetic toxicology testing for regulatory purposes. Cimino MC Environ Mol Mutagen; 2006 Jun; 47(5):362-90. PubMed ID: 16649190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toxicity assessment strategies, data requirements, and risk assessment approaches to derive health based guidance values for non-relevant metabolites of plant protection products. Dekant W; Melching-Kollmuss S; Kalberlah F Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19883711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ecotoxicity testing of chemicals with particular reference to pesticides. Walker CH Pest Manag Sci; 2006 Jul; 62(7):571-83. PubMed ID: 16671067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: effects on human male reproductive health. Murray TJ; Lea RG; Abramovich DR; Haites NE; Fowler PA Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill); 2001 Apr; 5(2):80-112. PubMed ID: 11753523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing. Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E; Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Science based guidance for the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties of chemicals. Bars R; Broeckaert F; Fegert I; Gross M; Hallmark N; Kedwards T; Lewis D; O'Hagan S; Panter GH; Weltje L; Weyers A; Wheeler JR; Galay-Burgos M Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 20858523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]