These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9487173)

  • 21. Statistical models appropriate for designs often used in group-randomized trials.
    Murray DM
    Stat Med; 2001 May 15-30; 20(9-10):1373-85. PubMed ID: 11343359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer?
    Torgerson DJ
    BMJ; 2001 Feb; 322(7282):355-7. PubMed ID: 11159665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical Research Methodology 3: Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Sessler DI; Imrey PB
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):1052-1064. PubMed ID: 26378705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rank minimization with a two-step analysis should not replace randomization in clinical trials.
    Morris T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):810-1. PubMed ID: 22564502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Review of randomized controlled trials: issues to consider when designing a trial.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):905-7. PubMed ID: 23726342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rationality and the generalization of randomized controlled trial evidence.
    Fuller J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):644-7. PubMed ID: 23368415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Observational studies: why are they so important?
    Mariani AW; Pêgo-Fernandes PM
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2014; 132(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24474072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using the Zelen design in randomized controlled trials: debates and controversies.
    Homer CS
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Apr; 38(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 11940133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maintenance treatment for patients with bipolar disorder.
    Somashekar BS; Jainer AK; Shafi W
    Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Oct; 166(10):1185; author reply 1186-7. PubMed ID: 19797446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Not Available].
    Buzzetti R
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Nov; 110(11):531. PubMed ID: 31808436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interpreting negative results from an underpowered clinical trial: warts and all.
    Van Cleave J; Kemper AR; Davis MM
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2006 Nov; 160(11):1126-9. PubMed ID: 17088515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bias in clinical intervention research.
    Gluud LL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 163(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 16443796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The pursuit of balance: An overview of covariate-adaptive randomization techniques in clinical trials.
    Lin Y; Zhu M; Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):21-5. PubMed ID: 26244705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Problems in the conduct of a randomised clinical trial.
    ter Riet G; Kessels AG; Knipschild P
    J Wound Care; 1998 May; 7(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 9677998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preparing for a randomized controlled trial: strategies to optimize the design of an individualized cardiovascular surgical patient education intervention.
    Fredericks SM; Yau TM
    Appl Nurs Res; 2014 May; 27(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 24792132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. For and against: clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial.
    Weijer C; Shapiro SH; Cranley Glass K
    BMJ; 2000 Sep; 321(7263):756-8. PubMed ID: 10999914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Misguided precedent is not a reason to use permuted blocks.
    Berger VW
    Headache; 2006; 46(7):1210-2. PubMed ID: 16866731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cluster randomized controlled trials.
    Puffer S; Torgerson DJ; Watson J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 11(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 16164589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Observational studies versus RCTs: what about socioeconomic factors?
    Rosén M; Axelsson S; Lindblom J
    Lancet; 2009 Jun; 373(9680):2026. PubMed ID: 19524779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: a valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials?
    van der Velden JM; Verkooijen HM; Young-Afat DA; Burbach JP; van Vulpen M; Relton C; van Gils CH; May AM; Groenwold RH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 46(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 27118559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.