439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9487208)
1. Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium: YAG lasers.
Ross V; Naseef G; Lin G; Kelly M; Michaud N; Flotte TJ; Raythen J; Anderson RR
Arch Dermatol; 1998 Feb; 134(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 9487208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Successful Treatment of Cosmetic Eyebrow Tattoos in Fitzpatrick III-IV With Picosecond (1,064, 532-nm) Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser With a Perfluorodecalin-Infused Patch: A Pilot Study.
Moustafa F; Suggs A; Hamill SS; Friedman PM
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Sep; 52(7):586-589. PubMed ID: 31828826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of picosecond versus nanosecond Nd:YAG lasers for the removal of cosmetic tattoos in an animal model.
Leu FJ; Huang CL; Wu YS; Wang CC
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 37(2):1343-1350. PubMed ID: 34410571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two picosecond lasers to a nanosecond laser for treating tattoos: a prospective randomized study on 49 patients.
Lorgeou A; Perrillat Y; Gral N; Lagrange S; Lacour JP; Passeron T
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2018 Feb; 32(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 28758261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser vs. Nd:YAG 1064-nm nanosecond laser in tattoo removal: a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial.
Pinto F; Große-Büning S; Karsai S; Weiß C; Bäumler W; Hammes S; Felcht M; Raulin C
Br J Dermatol; 2017 Feb; 176(2):457-464. PubMed ID: 27518129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New and Advanced Picosecond Lasers for Tattoo Removal.
Adatto MA; Amir R; Bhawalkar J; Sierra R; Bankowski R; Rozen D; Dierickx C; Lapidoth M
Curr Probl Dermatol; 2017; 52():113-123. PubMed ID: 28288459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perfluorodecalin-infused patch in picosecond and Q-switched laser-assisted tattoo removal: Safety in Fitzpatrick IV-VI skin types.
Vangipuram R; Hamill SS; Friedman PM
Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Jan; 51(1):23-26. PubMed ID: 30311666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Q-switched alexandrite, Nd:YAG, and ruby lasers in treating blue-black tattoos.
Leuenberger ML; Mulas MW; Hata TR; Goldman MP; Fitzpatrick RE; Grevelink JM
Dermatol Surg; 1999 Jan; 25(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9935085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser effectively treats tattoos. A controlled, dose-response study.
Kilmer SL; Lee MS; Grevelink JM; Flotte TJ; Anderson RR
Arch Dermatol; 1993 Aug; 129(8):971-8. PubMed ID: 8352621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural evaluation of tattoos treated with three laser systems.
Zelickson BD; Mehregan DA; Zarrin AA; Coles C; Hartwig P; Olson S; Leaf-Davis J
Lasers Surg Med; 1994; 15(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 7885170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of pigmentary disorders in patients with skin of color with a novel 755 nm picosecond, Q-switched ruby, and Q-switched Nd:YAG nanosecond lasers: A retrospective photographic review.
Levin MK; Ng E; Bae YS; Brauer JA; Geronemus RG
Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Feb; 48(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 26922302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of picosecond laser on the multi-colored tattoo removal using Hartley guinea pig: A preliminary study.
Choi MS; Seo HS; Kim JG; Choe SJ; Park BC; Kim MH; Hong SP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203370. PubMed ID: 30188934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combination of Dual Wavelength Picosecond and Nanosecond Pulse Width Neodymium-Doped Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Lasers for Tattoo Removal.
Kato H; Doi K; Kanayama K; Araki J; Nakatsukasa S; Chi D; Mori M; Fuse Y; Sakae Y; Uozumi T
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Jul; 52(6):515-522. PubMed ID: 31729066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laser removal of tattoos.
Kuperman-Beade M; Levine VJ; Ashinoff R
Am J Clin Dermatol; 2001; 2(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11702617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laser assisted tattoo removal - state of the art and new developments.
Bäumler W; Weiß KT
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2019 Feb; 18(2):349-358. PubMed ID: 30452057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative treatments of a green tattoo ink with Ruby, Nd:YAG nano- and picosecond lasers in normal and array mode.
Cecchetti D; Bauer EM; Guerriero E; Sennato S; Tagliatesta P; Tagliaferri M; Cerri L; Carbone M
Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3571. PubMed ID: 35246552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical and histologic prospective controlled comparative study of the picosecond titanium:sapphire (795 nm) laser versus the Q-switched alexandrite (752 nm) laser for removing tattoo pigment.
Herd RM; Alora MB; Smoller B; Arndt KA; Dover JS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1999 Apr; 40(4):603-6. PubMed ID: 10188681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of the Q-switched Neodymium: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in the Treatment of Blue-black Amateur and Professional Tattoos.
Lakshmi C; Krishnaswamy G
Indian J Dermatol; 2015; 60(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 26677271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tattoo removal with the Q-switched ruby laser and the Q-switched Nd:YAGlaser: a comparative study.
Levine VJ; Geronemus RG
Cutis; 1995 May; 55(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 7614841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of the Alexandrite laser for removal of tattoos.
Stafford TJ; Lizek R; Tan OT
Lasers Surg Med; 1995; 17(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 7564854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
