These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9487676)

  • 1. Evaluation of genetic variation within and between different chicken lines by DNA fingerprinting.
    Ponsuksili S; Wimmers K; Horst P
    J Hered; 1998; 89(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9487676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of oligonucleotide probes for simple tandem repeats (STR) to produce informative DNA fingerprints of the chicken.
    Wimmers K; Ponsuksili S; Valle-Zarate A; Horst P; Wittig B
    Br Poult Sci; 1998 Mar; 39(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 9568301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informative enzyme/probe combinations for the multilocus DNA fingerprinting of marsupials.
    Lambert K; Jones M; Shimmin G; Sofronidis G; Bowden D; Taggart D; Temple-Smith P
    Electrophoresis; 1997 Aug; 18(9):1688-92. PubMed ID: 9378146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic diversity among commercial chicken populations estimated from DNA fingerprints.
    Dunnington EA; Stallard LC; Hillel J; Siegel PB
    Poult Sci; 1994 Aug; 73(8):1218-25. PubMed ID: 7971663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deoxyribonucleic acid fingerprint comparisons between selected populations of chickens.
    Dunnington EA; Gal O; Siegel PB; Haberfeld A; Cahaner A; Lavi U; Plotsky Y; Hillel J
    Poult Sci; 1991 Mar; 70(3):463-7. PubMed ID: 2047339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic characterization of biodiversity in highly inbred chicken lines by microsatellite markers.
    Zhou H; Lamont SJ
    Anim Genet; 1999 Aug; 30(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 10467700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of parental genomic proportions in crossbred chickens by DNA fingerprints.
    Wimmers K; Ponsuksili S; Valle-Zarate A; Horst P; Wittig B
    J Anim Breed Genet; 1997 Jan; 114(1-6):55-68. PubMed ID: 21395803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic characterization of highly inbred chicken lines by two DNA methods: DNA fingerprinting and polymerase chain reaction using arbitrary primers.
    Plotsky Y; Kaiser MG; Lamont SJ
    Anim Genet; 1995 Jun; 26(3):163-70. PubMed ID: 7793683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of genetic parameters within and between turkey lines using DNA fingerprinting.
    Zhu J; Nestor KE; Patterson RA; Jackwood DJ; Emmerson DA
    Poult Sci; 1996 Apr; 75(4):439-46. PubMed ID: 8786931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNA fingerprinting in domestic animals.
    Buitkamp J; Ammer H; Geldermann H
    Electrophoresis; 1991; 12(2-3):169-74. PubMed ID: 1674909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic DNA fingerprinting of indigenous chicken breeds with molecular markers designed on interspersed repeats.
    Soattin M; Barcaccia G; Dalvit C; Cassandro M; Bittante G
    Hereditas; 2009 Oct; 146(5):183-97. PubMed ID: 19891738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic diversity of commercial turkey primary breeding lines as estimated by DNA fingerprinting.
    Ye X; Zhu J; Velleman SG; Nestor KE
    Poult Sci; 1998 Jun; 77(6):802-7. PubMed ID: 9628526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patterns of ribosomal gene variation in elite commercial chicken pure line populations.
    Delany ME
    Anim Genet; 2000 Apr; 31(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 10782209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic variation in parthenogenetic lizard Darevskia armeniaca: evidence from DNA fingerprinting data.
    Malysheva DN; Tokarskaya ON; Petrosyan VG; Danielyan FD; Darevsky IS; Ryskov AP
    J Hered; 2007; 98(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 17374876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of DNA fingerprinting for determining genetic diversity in sheep populations.
    Hermans IF; Morris CA; Chambers GK; Towers NR; Jordan TW
    Anim Genet; 1993 Oct; 24(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 8291740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of multilocus DNA fingerprints and microsatellites in an estimate of genetic distance in chicken.
    Ponsuksili S; Wimmers K; Schmoll F; Horst P; Schellander K
    J Hered; 1999; 90(6):656-9. PubMed ID: 10589517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multilocus DNA fingerprints in gallinaceous birds: general approach and problems.
    Hanotte O; Bruford MW; Burke T
    Heredity (Edinb); 1992 Jun; 68 ( Pt 6)():481-94. PubMed ID: 1612925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of DNA fingerprinting with digoxigenated oligonucleotide probe (CAC)5 to analysis of the genetic variation within Taenia taeniaeformis.
    Okamoto M; Ueda H; Hayashi M; Oku Y; Kurosawa T; Kamiya M
    J Vet Med Sci; 1995 Apr; 57(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 7492644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of heterosis from DNA fingerprints in chickens.
    Gavora JS; Fairfull RW; Benkel BF; Cantwell WJ; Chambers JR
    Genetics; 1996 Oct; 144(2):777-84. PubMed ID: 8889538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic distances estimated from DNA fingerprints in crosses of white Plymouth Rock chickens.
    Haberfeld A; Dunnington EA; Siegel PB
    Anim Genet; 1992; 23(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 1443774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.