These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9487790)

  • 1. The reasonable woman standard: a meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.
    Blumenthal JA
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Feb; 22(1):33-57. PubMed ID: 9487790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of sexual harassment: the effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism.
    Wiener RL; Hurt L; Russell B; Mannen K; Gasper C
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Feb; 21(1):71-93. PubMed ID: 9058574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.
    Rotundo M; Nguyen DH; Sackett PR
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):914-22. PubMed ID: 11596807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender influence on perceptions of hostile environment sexual harassment.
    Baird CL; Bensko NL; Bell PA; Viney W; Woody WD
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Aug; 77(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 7501779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reasonable woman standard: effects on sexual harassment court decisions.
    Perry EL; Kulik CT; Bourhis AC
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Feb; 28(1):9-27. PubMed ID: 15055339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective sexual harassment: differential treatment of similar groups of women workers.
    Hoffmann EA
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Feb; 28(1):29-45. PubMed ID: 15055340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace.
    Hurt LE; Wiener RL; Russell BL; Mannen RK
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(4):413-33. PubMed ID: 10653991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of sex and outcome expectancies on perceptions of sexual harassment.
    Leigh S; Thomas AG; Davies J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261409. PubMed ID: 34910767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do people evaluate social sexual conduct at work? A psycholegal model.
    Wiener RL; Hurt LE
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Feb; 85(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 10740958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explaining sexual harassment judgments: looking beyond gender of the rater.
    O'Connor M; Gutek BA; Stockdale M; Geer TM; Melançon R
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Feb; 28(1):69-95. PubMed ID: 15055342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dubious value of the "reasonable woman" standard in understanding sexual harassment.
    Eisenman R
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Dec; 77(3 Pt 2):1145-6. PubMed ID: 8643776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual harassment: four women describe their experiences--background and implications for the clinical nurse specialist.
    Hoyer A
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 1994 Jun; 8(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 8080306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual harassment: the "reasonable person" vs "reasonable woman" standards have not been resolved.
    Woody WD; Viney W; Bell PA; Bensko NL
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Feb; 78(1):329-30. PubMed ID: 8839324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are men sexually harassed? If so, by whom?
    Waldo CR; Berdahl JL; Fitzgerald LF
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Feb; 22(1):59-79. PubMed ID: 9487791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes and perceptions of workers to sexual harassment.
    McCabe MP; Hardman L
    J Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 145(6):719-40. PubMed ID: 16334516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The objective prong in sexual harassment: What is the standard?
    Wiener RL; Vardsveen TC
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Dec; 42(6):545-557. PubMed ID: 30272458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex-based harassment in employment: new insights into gender and context.
    Kabat-Farr D; Cortina LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):58-72. PubMed ID: 23914922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual harassment at work: issues and answers for health care administrators.
    Robinson RK; Franklin GM; Fink RL
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1993; 38(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 10126188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender harassment: broadening our understanding of sex-based harassment at work.
    Leskinen EA; Cortina LM; Kabat DB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 20661766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting perceptions of sexual harassment based on type of resistance and belief in token resistance.
    Osman SL
    J Sex Res; 2007 Nov; 44(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 18321013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.