These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9487842)

  • 1. Interproximal access efficacy of Sonicare Plus and Braun Oral-B Ultra compared to a manual toothbrush.
    Yankell SL; Emling RC; Shi X
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(1 Spec No):26-9. PubMed ID: 9487842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A six-month clinical comparison of the efficacy of the Sonicare and the Braun Oral-B electric toothbrushes on improving periodontal health in adult periodontitis patients.
    Robinson PJ; Maddalozzo D; Breslin S
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(1 Spec No):4-9. PubMed ID: 9487838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of a rippled bristles toothbrush and a flat manual toothbrush.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):82-4. PubMed ID: 8003238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: laboratory determination of relative interproximal cleaning efficiency of four powered toothbrushes.
    Sarker S; McLey L; Boyd RL
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(3 Spec No):81-5. PubMed ID: 9238891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Thirty-Day Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Rowenta, Braun and Sonicare Powered Toothbrushes and a Manual Toothbrush.
    Yankell SL; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(4):120-3. PubMed ID: 26630722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory evaluations of two battery-powered toothbrushes and a manual toothbrush for efficacy and safety.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC; Blatz B; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):187-90. PubMed ID: 12518487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of two compact manual toothbrushes.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):111-3. PubMed ID: 8031478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of bi-level and flat bristled toothbrushes.
    Yankell SL; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 8031482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory evaluations of elmex inter X toothbrushes for interproximal access efficacy and posterior tooth surface cleaning.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 12518499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.
    Warren P; Thompson M; Cugini M
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 17508624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory evaluations of interproximal access of two differently bristled manual toothbrushes.
    Battista GW; Petrone DM
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):85-7. PubMed ID: 8003239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.
    Haun J; Williams K; Friesen L; Ferrante A; Walters PA; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 12518488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of three power toothbrushes.
    Sharma NC; Lyle DM; Qaqish JG; Galustians J
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 8(3):83-8. PubMed ID: 16865997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interproximal access efficacy of three manual toothbrushes with extended, x-angled or flat multitufted bristles.
    Stiller S; Bosma ML; Shi X; Spirgel CM; Yankell SL
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2010 Aug; 8(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 20624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of two powered toothbrushes and one manual toothbrush in young adults.
    McCracken GI; Stacey F; Heasman L; Sellers P; Macgregor ID; Kelly PJ; Heasman PA
    J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 11475711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluations of plaque removal efficacy: an advanced rotating-oscillating power toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush.
    Biesbrock AR; Bartizek RD; Walters PA; Warren PR; Cugini M; Goyal CR; Qaqish J
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):106-11. PubMed ID: 18277740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the interproximal plaque removal efficacy of two powered toothbrushes using in vitro oral biofilms.
    Hope CK; Wilson M
    Am J Dent; 2002 Nov; 15 Spec No():7B-11B. PubMed ID: 12516675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three laboratory assessments of a new triple-head toothbrush and the Oral-B 40 toothbrush.
    Emling RC; Yankell SL; Shi X; Smith JC
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 15974217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laboratory assessment of the Sensodyne Mikro Aktiv extra soft toothbrush and the Oral-B indicator soft toothbrush.
    Emling RC; Shi X; Yankell SL; Smith JC
    J Clin Dent; 2008; 19(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 18763687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative laboratory evaluation of three toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1992; 3(Suppl C):C5-8. PubMed ID: 1306675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.