These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9487850)

  • 21. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals.
    Aydin C; Inan U; Yasar S; Bulucu B; Tunca YM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):e92-7. PubMed ID: 18280956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Zhang L; Luo HX; Zhou XD; Tan H; Huang DM
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):456-8. PubMed ID: 18358896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of stainless steel Flexofiles and nickel-titanium NiTiFlex files during the shaping of simulated canals.
    Bishop K; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 1997 Jan; 30(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 9477791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Shaping ability of GTTM Rotary Files in simulated resin root canals.
    Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; Raes H; De Moor RJ
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jul; 35(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 12190900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Ciftçioğlu E; Ozkarsli SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e86-93. PubMed ID: 20416526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study.
    Ward JR; Parashos P; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2003 Nov; 29(11):756-63. PubMed ID: 14651285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
    J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments on preparing curved canals in posterior teeth.
    Wei X; Ling J; Zhang S
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Sep; 37(5):333-5. PubMed ID: 12425841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the performance of four files with rounded tips during shaping of simulated root canals.
    Dummer PM; al-Omari MA; Bryant S
    J Endod; 1998 May; 24(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 9641115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of canal preparation using the K-file and Lightspeed in resin blocks.
    Tharuni SL; Parameswaran A; Sukumaran VG
    J Endod; 1996 Sep; 22(9):474-6. PubMed ID: 9198429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
    Gergi R; Sabbagh C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of LightSpeed LS1 and LightSpeed LSX NiTi rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in simulated root canals.
    Iqbal MK; Banfield B; Lavorini A; Bachstein B
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 17320711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modeling capacity of ENDOflash files in simulated root canals.
    Fariniuk LF; Baratto-Filho F; Guerisoli DM; Barbizam JV; Pécora JD; Sousa-Neto MD
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11210250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.