These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9489181)

  • 1. Priority setting in health care: unburdening from the burden of disease.
    Mooney G; Irwig L; Leeder S
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Dec; 21(7):680-1. PubMed ID: 9489181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Priority setting in health care: burden of disease cannot be jettisoned.
    Bradshaw D; Schneider M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1998 Jun; 22(4):517. PubMed ID: 9659786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Should the treatment of children be the first priority?].
    Kekomäki M
    Duodecim; 1997; 113(7):551, 553. PubMed ID: 11466881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: Open and fair.
    Ottersen T; Førde R; Kakad M; Kjellevold A; Melberg HO; Moen A; Ringard Å; Norheim OF
    Health Policy; 2016 Mar; 120(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 26851991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why cost-of-illness studies are important and inform policy.
    Durand-Zaleski I
    Vasc Med; 2008 Aug; 13(3):251-3. PubMed ID: 18687763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Burden of Disease Study and Priority Setting in Korea: an Ethical Perspective.
    Park SY; Kwon I; Oh IH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S108-S113. PubMed ID: 27775247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influencing policy to advance practice in ways that improve health.
    Watson D
    Can J Occup Ther; 2009 Jul; 76 Spec No():195-8. PubMed ID: 19757724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Values and evidence colliding: health technology assessment in child health.
    Ungar WJ; Prosser LA; Burnett HF
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2013 Aug; 13(4):417-9. PubMed ID: 23977967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Priority setting in healthcare: towards guidelines for the program budgeting and marginal analysis framework.
    Peacock SJ; Mitton C; Ruta D; Donaldson C; Bate A; Hedden L
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Oct; 10(5):539-52. PubMed ID: 20950070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Key factors that influence government policies and decision making about healthcare priorities: Lessons for the field of eating disorders.
    Whiteford H; Weissman RS
    Int J Eat Disord; 2017 Mar; 50(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28221676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The National Service Framework--suggestions about priorities for policy development welcome.
    Kirkwood TB
    Age Ageing; 2002 Sep; 31(5):409, 411; author reply 411-2. PubMed ID: 12242208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disease management index of potential years of life lost as a tool for setting priorities in national disease control using OECD health data.
    Jang SI; Nam JM; Choi J; Park EC
    Health Policy; 2014 Mar; 115(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 24365032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reforming the Australian health care system: a government perspective.
    Podger A
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1999; 18(3):111-3. PubMed ID: 10388207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A critical review of priority setting in the health sector: the methodology of the 1993 World Development Report.
    Paalman M; Bekedam H; Hawken L; Nyheim D
    Health Policy Plan; 1998 Mar; 13(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 10178182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The present status of health care in Rhode Island from the insurance intermediary.
    Powell M
    Med Health R I; 2000 Sep; 83(9):271-2. PubMed ID: 11002664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Value in Health: How It Is Defined and Used in Priority Setting and Pricing in Norway.
    Melberg HO
    Healthc Pap; 2019 Oct; 18(3):22-28. PubMed ID: 31642804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approaches to appropriate care delivery from a policy perspective: A case study of Australia, England and Switzerland.
    Robertson-Preidler J; Anstey M; Biller-Andorno N; Norrish A
    Health Policy; 2017 Jul; 121(7):770-777. PubMed ID: 28495121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bottom-up priority setting revised. A second evaluation of an institutional intervention in a Swedish health care organisation.
    Waldau S
    Health Policy; 2015 Sep; 119(9):1226-36. PubMed ID: 25724824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How have systematic priority setting approaches influenced policy making? A synthesis of the current literature.
    Kapiriri L; Razavi D
    Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):937-946. PubMed ID: 28734682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health care economic analyses.
    Brown GC; Brown MM; Sharma S
    Retina; 2004 Feb; 24(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 15076955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.