These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9489253)

  • 1. Economic evaluation of diagnostic technology. Methodological challenges and viable solutions.
    Sassi F; McKee M; Roberts JA
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(4):613-30. PubMed ID: 9489253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bridging trial and decision: a checklist to frame health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions.
    Grutters JP; Seferina SC; Tjan-Heijnen VC; van Kampen RJ; Goettsch WG; Joore MA
    Value Health; 2011; 14(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 21839418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expanding Health Technology Assessments to Include Effects on the Environment.
    Marsh K; Ganz ML; Hsu J; Strandberg-Larsen M; Gonzalez RP; Lund N
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 27021760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis and formulary decision making in England: findings from research.
    Williams IP; Bryan S
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Nov; 65(10):2116-29. PubMed ID: 17698271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Economic evaluation of medical therapy--methodological principles].
    Szucs TD; Schramm W
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(8):577-83. PubMed ID: 7571888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: a review of methods and applications.
    Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Sep; 9(5):331-47. PubMed ID: 21875163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of health technology: economic issues for health policy and policy issues for economic appraisal.
    Drummond M
    Soc Sci Med; 1994 Jun; 38(12):1593-600. PubMed ID: 8047916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assessment of health economic evaluation.
    Chaikledkaew U; Kittrongsiri K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S113-8. PubMed ID: 24964708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of economic evaluation to decision making in early phases of product development: a methodological and empirical review.
    Hartz S; John J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 18828942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making sensible rationing: the use of economic evidence and the need for methodological standards.
    Tangcharoensathien V; Kamolratanakul P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S4-7. PubMed ID: 19253481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An economic theory of the fourth hurdle.
    Rogowski WH
    Health Econ; 2013 May; 22(5):600-10. PubMed ID: 22544431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are adverse effects incorporated in economic models? An initial review of current practice.
    Craig D; McDaid C; Fonseca T; Stock C; Duffy S; Woolacott N
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Dec; 13(62):1-71, 97-181, iii. PubMed ID: 20018146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transparency vs. closed-door policy: do process characteristics have an impact on the outcomes of coverage decisions? A statistical analysis.
    Fischer KE; Rogowski WH; Leidl R; Stollenwerk B
    Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 112(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 23664301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seeing the NICE side of cost-effectiveness analysis: a qualitative investigation of the use of CEA in NICE technology appraisals.
    Bryan S; Williams I; McIver S
    Health Econ; 2007 Feb; 16(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 16960851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PRIORITIES FOR HEALTH ECONOMIC METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH: RESULTS OF AN EXPERT CONSULTATION.
    Tordrup D; Chouaid C; Cuijpers P; Dab W; van Dongen JM; Espin J; Jönsson B; Léonard C; McDaid D; McKee M; Miguel JP; Patel A; Reginster JY; Ricciardi W; Rutten-van Molken M; Rupel VP; Sach T; Sassi F; Waugh N; Bertollini R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(6):609-619. PubMed ID: 29081308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The which-hunt: assembling health technologies for assessment and rationing.
    Giacomini MK
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1999 Aug; 24(4):715-58. PubMed ID: 10503155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: an audit of NICE current practice and a review of its use and value in decision-making.
    Andronis L; Barton P; Bryan S
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13(29):iii, ix-xi, 1-61. PubMed ID: 19500484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of NICE technology appraisal in NHS rationing.
    Walker S; Palmer S; Sculpher M
    Br Med Bull; 2007; 81-82():51-64. PubMed ID: 17409119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.
    Marsh K; IJzerman M; Thokala P; Baltussen R; Boysen M; Kaló Z; Lönngren T; Mussen F; Peacock S; Watkins J; Devlin N;
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):125-37. PubMed ID: 27021745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.