These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9490952)

  • 1. Peak enhancement of the liver in children using power injection and helical CT.
    Ruess L; Bulas DI; Kushner DC; Silverman PM; Fearon TC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 9490952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.
    Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
    Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of different threshold levels and injection rates on hepatic enhancement by using bolus tracking technique in helical CT].
    Erdoğan C; Savci G
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 14661491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material.
    Silverman PM; Roberts SC; Ducic I; Tefft MC; Olson MC; Cooper C; Zeman RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8659426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hepatic enhancement analysis in children using smart prep monitoring for 2 : 1 pitch helical scanning.
    Vade A; Olson MC; Vittore CP; Subbaiah P
    Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Sep; 29(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 10460331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics.
    Platt JF; Reige KA; Ellis JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9888738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT.
    Garcia PA; Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Liang L; Reinhold C; Atri M
    Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate?
    Frederick MG; McElaney BL; Singer A; Park KS; Paulson EK; McGee SG; Nelson RC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1305-10. PubMed ID: 8633437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
    Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in infants and children using bolus tracking.
    Frush DP; Spencer EB; Donnelly LF; Zheng JY; DeLong DM; Bisset GS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1007-13. PubMed ID: 10587137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, SmartPrep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement.
    Silverman PM; Roberts S; Tefft MC; Brown B; Fox SH; Cooper C; Zeman RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jul; 165(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 7785637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: a comparison of two bolus tracking techniques.
    Schweiger GD; Chang PJ; Brown BP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1551-8. PubMed ID: 9843287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas.
    Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Atri M; Garcia P; Reinhold C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8659419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol.
    Foley WD; Hoffmann RG; Quiroz FA; Kahn CE; Perret RS
    Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 8029399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hepatic contrast enhancement at CT: influence of intravenous glucagon in a canine model.
    Warshauer DM; Hiken JN; Molina PL; Hackney SL; Bellinger DA; Lee JK
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 7480678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
    Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
    Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.