106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9490952)
1. Peak enhancement of the liver in children using power injection and helical CT.
Ruess L; Bulas DI; Kushner DC; Silverman PM; Fearon TC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 9490952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.
Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect of different threshold levels and injection rates on hepatic enhancement by using bolus tracking technique in helical CT].
Erdoğan C; Savci G
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 14661491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material.
Silverman PM; Roberts SC; Ducic I; Tefft MC; Olson MC; Cooper C; Zeman RK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8659426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hepatic enhancement analysis in children using smart prep monitoring for 2 : 1 pitch helical scanning.
Vade A; Olson MC; Vittore CP; Subbaiah P
Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Sep; 29(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 10460331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics.
Platt JF; Reige KA; Ellis JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9888738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT.
Garcia PA; Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Liang L; Reinhold C; Atri M
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate?
Frederick MG; McElaney BL; Singer A; Park KS; Paulson EK; McGee SG; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1305-10. PubMed ID: 8633437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in infants and children using bolus tracking.
Frush DP; Spencer EB; Donnelly LF; Zheng JY; DeLong DM; Bisset GS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1007-13. PubMed ID: 10587137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, SmartPrep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement.
Silverman PM; Roberts S; Tefft MC; Brown B; Fox SH; Cooper C; Zeman RK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jul; 165(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 7785637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: a comparison of two bolus tracking techniques.
Schweiger GD; Chang PJ; Brown BP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1551-8. PubMed ID: 9843287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas.
Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Atri M; Garcia P; Reinhold C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8659419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol.
Foley WD; Hoffmann RG; Quiroz FA; Kahn CE; Perret RS
Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 8029399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hepatic contrast enhancement at CT: influence of intravenous glucagon in a canine model.
Warshauer DM; Hiken JN; Molina PL; Hackney SL; Bellinger DA; Lee JK
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 7480678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
