These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9490952)
21. Hepatic CT enhancement. Part II. Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients. Chambers TP; Baron RL; Lush RM Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):518-22. PubMed ID: 7972771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of varying rates of low-osmolarity contrast media injection for hepatic CT: correlation with indocyanine green transit time. Harmon BH; Berland LL; Lee JY Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):379-82. PubMed ID: 1620831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contrast enhancement for whole-body screening using multidetector row helical CT: comparison between uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. Awai K; Imuta M; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Shamima S; Kawanaka K; Hori S; Yamashita Y Radiat Med; 2004; 22(5):303-9. PubMed ID: 15553010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT. Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Tsuda K; Tomoda K; Narumi Y; Oi H; Nakamura H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 9694469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison between one-route and two-route injection for liver and aortic enhancement using MDCT. Okada M; Murakami T; Kumano S; Imaoka I; Shimono T; Ashikaga R; Hosono M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W323-6. PubMed ID: 18492873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Awai K; Hiraishi K; Hori S Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 14695390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Simulation of aortic peak enhancement on MDCT using a contrast material flow phantom: feasibility study. Awai K; Hatcho A; Nakayama Y; Kusunoki S; Liu D; Hatemura M; Funama Y; Denbo M; Sato N; Yamashita Y AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 16423942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Variation of the time to aortic enhancement of fixed-duration versus fixed-rate injection protocols. Kim MJ; Chung YE; Kim KW; Chung JJ; Lim JS; Oh YT; Kim JH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 16357400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Safety and efficacy of pressure-limited power injection of iodinated contrast medium through central lines in children. Rigsby CK; Gasber E; Seshadri R; Sullivan C; Wyers M; Ben-Ami T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):726-32. PubMed ID: 17312060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Enhancement of hepatic parenchyma, aorta, and portal vein in helical CT: comparison of iodixanol and iopromide. Graf O; Gazelle GS; Kreuzer S; Halpern EF; Boehm P; Lechner G; Mueller PR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):213-7. PubMed ID: 8976948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row CT of liver: contrast-enhancement theory and practical scan protocol with a combination of fixed injection duration and patients' body-weight-tailored dose of contrast material. Ichikawa T; Erturk SM; Araki T Eur J Radiol; 2006 May; 58(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 16417983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 9609887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dynamic helical CT of the abdomen: prospective comparison of pre- and postprandial contrast enhancement. Sheafor DH; Keogan MT; DeLong DM; Nelson RC Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):359-63. PubMed ID: 9457186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography. Berland LL; Lee JY Invest Radiol; 1988 Dec; 23(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 3203993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. Heiken JP; Brink JA; McClennan BL; Sagel SS; Forman HP; DiCroce J Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 8475268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of contrast material injection duration on arterial enhancement at CT in patients with various cardiac indices: Analysis using computer simulation. Higaki T; Nakaura T; Kidoh M; Yuki H; Yamashita Y; Nakamura Y; Tatsugami F; Baba Y; Iida M; Awai K PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191347. PubMed ID: 29474457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Conspicuity of hepatic metastases on helical CT: effect of different time delays between contrast administration and scanning. Silverman PM; O'Malley J; Tefft MC; Cooper C; Zeman RK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 7863882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Imaging of the liver with helical CT: a survey of scanning techniques. Silverman PM; Kohan L; Ducic I; Javadi S; Meyer C; Sharma N; Cooper C; Zeman RK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 9423622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]