296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9491868)
1. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Peterson DE; Delke I; Gaudier FL; Kaunitz AM
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 91(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 9491868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Khoury AN; Zhou QP; Gorenberg DM; Nies BM; Manley GE; Mecklenburg FE
J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
Chang YK; Chen WH; Yu MH; Liu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Jones MM; Rahall A; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1804-10. PubMed ID: 7778636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
Austin SC; Sanchez-Ramos L; Adair CD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):624.e1-9. PubMed ID: 20430362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents.
Ramsey PS; Harris DY; Ogburn PL; Heise RH; Magtibay PM; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 188(2):560-5. PubMed ID: 12592272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Wing DA; Brown R; Plante LA; Miller H; Rugarn O; Powers BL
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 122(2 Pt 1):201-209. PubMed ID: 23857539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital.
Blanchette HA; Nayak S; Erasmus S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1551-9. PubMed ID: 10368503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
le Roux PA; Olarogun JO; Penny J; Anthony J
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
