These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9491868)
21. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Nunes F; Rodrigues R; Meirinho M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Cervical ripening at term. A randomized and prospective study: Misoprotol versus dinoprostone]. Trabelsi H; Mathlouthi N; Zayen S; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Trabelsi K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 22585642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Misoprostol vaginal insert (Mysodelle) versus Dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin) for induction of labour. Sharp A; Faluyi D; Alfirevic Z Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():41-44. PubMed ID: 31226576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review. Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor. Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation. Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial. De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Envid Lázaro BM; Franco Royo MJ; Roca Arquillué M; Campillos Maza JM Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy. Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Induction of labour with retrievable prostaglandin vaginal inserts: outcomes following retrieval due to an intrapartum adverse event. Rugarn O; Tipping D; Powers B; Wing DA BJOG; 2017 Apr; 124(5):796-803. PubMed ID: 27307397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction. Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison]. Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening. Charoenkul S; Sripramote M J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1026-34. PubMed ID: 11075969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective randomized trial of labor induction with vaginal controlled-release dinoprostone inserts with or without oxytocin and misoprostol+oxytocin. Tanir HM; Sener T; Yildiz C; Kaya M; Kurt I Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2008; 35(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 18390085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical ripening: a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone. Perry KG; Larmon JE; May WL; Robinette LG; Martin RW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1333-40. PubMed ID: 9662319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor. Mayer RB; Oppelt P; Shebl O; Pömer J; Allerstorfer C; Weiss C Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():89-93. PubMed ID: 26995147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term. Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Otigbah CM; Howard RJ; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Neiger R; Greaves PC Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]