268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9492134)
1. Emergency physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography.
Graham ID; Stiell IG; Laupacis A; O'Connor AM; Wells GA
Acad Emerg Med; 1998 Feb; 5(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 9492134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International survey of emergency physicians' awareness and use of the Canadian Cervical-Spine Rule and the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule.
Eagles D; Stiell IG; Clement CM; Brehaut J; Taljaard M; Kelly AM; Mason S; Kellermann A; Perry JJ
Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1256-61. PubMed ID: 18945241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Awareness and use of the Ottawa ankle and knee rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice?
Graham ID; Stiell IG; Laupacis A; McAuley L; Howell M; Clancy M; Durieux P; Simon N; Emparanza JI; Aginaga JR; O'connor A; Wells G
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Mar; 37(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 11223761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emergency physicians' knowledge and attitudes of clinical decision support in the electronic health record: a survey-based study.
Ballard DW; Rauchwerger AS; Reed ME; Vinson DR; Mark DG; Offerman SR; Chettipally UK; Graetz I; Dayan P; Kuppermann N;
Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 20(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 23701342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A survey of emergency physicians' fear of malpractice and its association with the decision to order computed tomography scans for children with minor head trauma.
Wong AC; Kowalenko T; Roahen-Harrison S; Smith B; Maio RF; Stanley RM
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2011 Mar; 27(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 21346679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries.
Brehaut JC; Graham ID; Wood TJ; Taljaard M; Eagles D; Lott A; Clement C; Kelly AM; Mason S; Stiell IG
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(3):398-408. PubMed ID: 20042533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of implementation strategies for increasing clinicians' use of five validated imaging decision rules for musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review.
Kharel P; Zadro JR; Wong G; Rojanabenjawong K; Traeger A; Linklater J; Maher CG
BMC Emerg Med; 2024 May; 24(1):84. PubMed ID: 38760697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding the Canadian adult CT head rule trial: use of the theoretical domains framework for process evaluation.
Curran JA; Brehaut J; Patey AM; Osmond M; Stiell I; Grimshaw JM
Implement Sci; 2013 Feb; 8():25. PubMed ID: 23433082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients.
Stiell IG; Wells GA; Vandemheen KL; Clement CM; Lesiuk H; De Maio VJ; Laupacis A; Schull M; McKnight RD; Verbeek R; Brison R; Cass D; Dreyer J; Eisenhauer MA; Greenberg GH; MacPhail I; Morrison L; Reardon M; Worthington J
JAMA; 2001 Oct; 286(15):1841-8. PubMed ID: 11597285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomography use in minor head injury: attitudes and practices of emergency physicians, neurosurgeons, and radiologists in Turkey.
Özan E; Ataç GK
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2018 Mar; 24(2):121-128. PubMed ID: 29569683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of clinical decision rules on clinical care of traumatic injuries to the foot and ankle, knee, cervical spine, and head.
Perry JJ; Stiell IG
Injury; 2006 Dec; 37(12):1157-65. PubMed ID: 17078955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emergency physicians' attitudes and preferences regarding computed tomography, radiation exposure, and imaging decision support.
Griffey RT; Jeffe DB; Bailey T
Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Jul; 21(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25125272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Head CT scan in Iranian minor head injury patients: evaluating current decision rules.
Sadegh R; Karimialavijeh E; Shirani F; Payandemehr P; Bahramimotlagh H; Ramezani M
Emerg Radiol; 2016 Feb; 23(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 26407978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External validation of computed tomography decision rules for minor head injury: prospective, multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands.
Foks KA; van den Brand CL; Lingsma HF; van der Naalt J; Jacobs B; de Jong E; den Boogert HF; Sir Ö; Patka P; Polinder S; Gaakeer MI; Schutte CE; Jie KE; Visee HF; Hunink MGM; Reijners E; Braaksma M; Schoonman GG; Steyerberg EW; Jellema K; Dippel DWJ
BMJ; 2018 Aug; 362():k3527. PubMed ID: 30143521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Will a new clinical decision rule be widely used? The case of the Canadian C-spine rule.
Brehaut JC; Stiell IG; Graham ID
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Apr; 13(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 16531607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of adapted PECARN decision rule for children with minor head injury in the pediatric emergency department.
Bressan S; Romanato S; Mion T; Zanconato S; Da Dalt L
Acad Emerg Med; 2012 Jul; 19(7):801-7. PubMed ID: 22724450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pediatric emergency physician opinions on ankle radiograph clinical decision rules.
Boutis K; Constantine E; Schuh S; Pecaric M; Stephens D; Narayanan UG
Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Jul; 17(7):709-17. PubMed ID: 20653584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice.
Brehaut JC; Stiell IG; Visentin L; Graham ID
Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 12(10):948-56. PubMed ID: 16166599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule to Patients With Minimal Head Injury.
Davey K; Saul T; Russel G; Wassermann J; Quaas J
Ann Emerg Med; 2018 Oct; 72(4):342-350. PubMed ID: 29753518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variation in the use of skull radiographs by emergency physicians in young children with minor head trauma.
Carrière B; Clément K; Gravel J
CJEM; 2014 Jul; 16(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 25060081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
