These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9492686)

  • 1. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Experts' views are still needed.
    Vandenbroucke JP
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):469-70; author reply 470-1. PubMed ID: 9492686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Increase in studies of publication bias coincided with increasing use of meta-analysis.
    Song F; Gilbody S
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):471. PubMed ID: 9492690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Graphical test is itself biased.
    Irwig L; Macaskill P; Berry G; Glasziou P
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):470; author reply 470-1. PubMed ID: 9492687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Prospectively identified trials could be used for comparison with meta-analyses.
    Langhorne P
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):471. PubMed ID: 9492689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Test had 10% false positive rate.
    Seagroatt V; Stratton I
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):470; author reply 470-1. PubMed ID: 9492688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2465-77. PubMed ID: 12205693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
    Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
    Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis.
    Rosenberg MS
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):464-8. PubMed ID: 15807430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis by P. Macaskill, S. D. Walter and L. Irwig, Statistics in Medicine, 2001; 20:641-654.
    Begg CB
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1803; author reply 1804. PubMed ID: 12111913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.
    Borm GF; Donders AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):825-830.e10. PubMed ID: 19136233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.
    Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2911-21. PubMed ID: 16345059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the funnel plot in detecting publication and related biases in meta-analysis.
    Liu JL
    Evid Based Dent; 2011 Dec; 12(4):121-2. PubMed ID: 22193659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.