BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9493537)

  • 1. Results of isolated acetabular revisions: the fate of the unrevised femoral component.
    Poon ED; Lachiewicz PF
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jan; 13(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 9493537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.
    Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
    Clohisy JC; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note.
    Bal BS; Maurer T; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1703-6. PubMed ID: 10608381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
    Dearborn JT; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
    Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up.
    Shinar AA; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Feb; 79(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 9052535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fate of stable femoral components retained during isolated acetabular revision: a six-to-twelve-year follow-up study.
    Moskal JT; Shen FH; Brown TE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Feb; 84(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 11861731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
    Dearborn JT; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision of the acetabular component with an uncemented Harris-Galante porous-coated prosthesis.
    Tanzer M; Drucker D; Jasty M; McDonald M; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Aug; 74(7):987-94. PubMed ID: 1522106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Whaley AL; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 83(9):1352-7. PubMed ID: 11568198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision of a total hip arthroplasty with a Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component inserted without cement. A follow-up note on the results at five to twelve years.
    Lachiewicz PF; Poon ED
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Jul; 80(7):980-4. PubMed ID: 9698002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component. Excellent results at ten-year follow-up.
    McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Nov; 79(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 9393901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
    Clohisy JC; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Isolated acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty: results at 5-9 years of follow-up.
    Chen XD; Waddell JP; Morton J; Schemitsch EH
    Int Orthop; 2005 Oct; 29(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 16094540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
    de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
    Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing the longer-term survival of uncemented acetabular components used in total hip revisions.
    Jones CP; Lachiewicz PF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Feb; 86(2):342-7. PubMed ID: 14960680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Maggs JL; Smeatham A; Whitehouse SL; Charity J; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 26920954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.