These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9493725)
1. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon. Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser JK; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Feuerbach S Invest Radiol; 1998 Feb; 33(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 9493725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus screen-film radiography: effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone defects and fractures. Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Spahn M; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Spies V; Alexander J; Feuerbach S Invest Radiol; 1998 Jan; 33(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9438507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flat-panel x-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology. Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies. Völk M; Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Alexander J; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Spahn M; Feuerbach S Invest Radiol; 1997 Jul; 32(7):373-7. PubMed ID: 9228601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings. Rapp-Bernhardt U; Roehl FW; Gibbs RC; Schmidl H; Krause UW; Bernhardt TM Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):484-92. PubMed ID: 12676965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography. Völk M; Strotzer M; Holzknecht N; Manke C; Lenhart M; Gmeinwieser J; Link J; Reiser M; Feuerbach S Clin Radiol; 2000 Aug; 55(8):615-21. PubMed ID: 10964733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector. Hosch WP; Fink C; Radeleff B; kampschulte a A; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J Clin Radiol; 2002 Oct; 57(10):902-7. PubMed ID: 12413914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chest radiography with a large-area detector based on cesium-iodide/amorphous-silicon technology: image quality and dose requirement in comparison with an asymmetric screen-film system. Strotzer M; Völk M; Reiser M; Lenhart M; Manke C; Gmeinwieser J; Holzknecht N; Link J; Feuerbach S J Thorac Imaging; 2000 Jul; 15(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 10928606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom. Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions. Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Digital flat image detector technique based on cesium iodide and amorphous silicon: experimental studies and initial clinical results]. Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Feuerbach S Rofo; 1999 Jan; 170(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 10071647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of a flat-panel detector at low tube voltage in chest radiography: a phantom study. Bernhardt TM; Rapp-Bernhardt U; Lenzen H; Röhl FW; Diederich S; Papke K; Ludwig K; Heindel W Invest Radiol; 2004 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 14734924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography. Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of simulated chest lesions by using soft-copy reading: comparison of an amorphous silicon flat-panel-detector system and a storage-phosphor system. Goo JM; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Seo JB; Kim HY; Lee YJ; Kang JW; Kim JH Radiology; 2002 Jul; 224(1):242-6. PubMed ID: 12091690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses. Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications. Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]