153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9493949)
21. The right to be crazy.
Isaac RJ; Armat VC
Am Enterp; 1990; 1(5):34-42. PubMed ID: 11659838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Civil commitment viewed from three perspectives: professional, family, and police.
Husted JR; Nehemkis A
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(4):533-46. PubMed ID: 8639981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effectiveness of outpatient civil commitment.
Munetz MR; Grande T; Kleist J; Peterson GA
Psychiatr Serv; 1996 Nov; 47(11):1251-3. PubMed ID: 8916245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. "The street will drive you crazy": why homeless psychotic women in the institutional circuit in the United States often say no to offers of help.
Luhrmann TM
Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Jan; 165(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 18086748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The mentally ill homeless: evolving involuntary commitment issues.
Ludwig EV
Villanova Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 36(5):1085-111. PubMed ID: 11659576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Down and out--but determined. Does a mentally disturbed woman have the right to be homeless?
Hornblower M
Time; 1987 Nov; 130(21):29. PubMed ID: 10284424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Can the police assist in detaining persons for involuntary commitment?
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 1997 Jan; 48(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9117493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. "Crazy" until proven innocent? Civil commitment of the mentally ill homeless.
Kaufman MS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1988; 19(2):333-67. PubMed ID: 11659184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Consent to treat: clinical and legal implications.
Manchanda R; Fernando ML; Galbraith DA
Can J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 34(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 2924251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Withdrawal from the homeless mentally ill.
Chafetz L
Community Ment Health J; 1990 Oct; 26(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 2257728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Coercing future freedom: consent and capacities for autonomous choice.
Epright MC
J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 21105943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Decoding right to refuse treatment law.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1993; 16(1-2):151-77. PubMed ID: 8099069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Will we save the homeless mentally ill?
Lamb HR
Am J Psychiatry; 1990 May; 147(5):649-51. PubMed ID: 2327496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Coercion and legal protection in psychiatric care in Finland.
Kokkonen P
Med Law; 1993; 12(1-2):113-24. PubMed ID: 8377603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Supreme Court rulings in two cases broaden legal protections for mentally ill criminal defendants.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1992 Jul; 43(7):752-3. PubMed ID: 1355462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The test of compulsion in mental health law: capacity, therapeutic benefit and dangerousness as possible criteria.
Bartlett P
Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(3):326-52. PubMed ID: 16733878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A perspective on voluntary and involuntary outreach services for the homeless mentally ill.
Tsemberis S; Elfenbein C
New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1999; (82):9-19. PubMed ID: 10380532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Services for the homeless mentally ill.
Geller J
Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Feb; 148(2):272-3. PubMed ID: 1987830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The ethics of involuntary procedures.
Vuckovich PK
Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2000; 36(4):111-2. PubMed ID: 12035202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Outpatient civil commitment: a dangerous charade or a component of a comprehensive institution of civil commitment?
Schopp RF
Psychol Public Policy Law; 2003; 9(1-2):33-69. PubMed ID: 16700136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
