These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9494125)

  • 1. Hazard screening of chemical releases and environmental equity analysis of populations proximate to toxic release inventory facilities in Oregon.
    Neumann CM; Forman DL; Rothlein JE
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Apr; 106(4):217-26. PubMed ID: 9494125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Socio-demographic Differences in Toxic Release Inventory Siting and Emissions in Metro Atlanta.
    Johnson R; Ramsey-White K; Fuller CH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 27455302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total and cardiovascular mortality rates in relation to discharges from Toxics Release Inventory sites in the United States.
    Hendryx M; Luo J; Chen BC
    Environ Res; 2014 Aug; 133():36-41. PubMed ID: 24906066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The U.S. EPA Geographic Information System for mapping environmental releases of Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI) chemicals.
    Stockwell JR; Sorensen JW; Eckert JW; Carreras EM
    Risk Anal; 1993 Apr; 13(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 8502789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GIS modeling of air toxics releases from TRI-reporting and non-TRI-reporting facilities: impacts for environmental justice.
    Dolinoy DC; Miranda ML
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Dec; 112(17):1717-24. PubMed ID: 15579419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantity-based and toxicity-based evaluation of the U.S. Toxics Release Inventory.
    Lim SR; Lam CW; Schoenung JM
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):49-56. PubMed ID: 20122796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the U.S. EPA Toxic Release Inventory database for environmental health research.
    Neumann CM
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 1998; 1(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9644330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental justice: frequency and severity of US chemical industry accidents and the socioeconomic status of surrounding communities.
    Elliott MR; Wang Y; Lowe RA; Kleindorfer PR
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Jan; 58(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 14684723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Pollution Prevention on Toxic Environmental Releases from U.S. Manufacturing Facilities.
    Ranson M; Cox B; Keenan C; Teitelbaum D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(21):12951-7. PubMed ID: 26477531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toxic chemical release inventory information.
    Bronson RJ
    Med Ref Serv Q; 1991; 10(1):17-34. PubMed ID: 10111718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental justice implications of reduced reporting requirements of the Toxics Release Inventory Burden Reduction Rule.
    Miranda ML; Keating MH; Edwards SE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Aug; 42(15):5407-14. PubMed ID: 18754453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An independent review and prioritization of past radionuclide and chemical releases from the Los Alamos National Laboratory--implications for future dose reconstruction studies.
    Le MH; Buddenbaum JE; Burns RE; Shonka JJ; Gaffney SH; Donovan EP; Flack SM; Widner TE
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Oct; 13(10):2735-47. PubMed ID: 21904770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations.
    Zeeman M; Auer CM; Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Boethling RS
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):179-201. PubMed ID: 8564854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximity to extremely hazardous substances for people with disabilities: A case study in Houston, Texas.
    Chakraborty J
    Disabil Health J; 2019 Jan; 12(1):121-125. PubMed ID: 30126829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acute exposure to extremely hazardous substances: an analysis of environmental equity.
    Chakraborty J
    Risk Anal; 2001 Oct; 21(5):883-95. PubMed ID: 11798124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The exposure data landscape for manufactured chemicals.
    Egeghy PP; Judson R; Gangwal S; Mosher S; Smith D; Vail J; Cohen Hubal EA
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jan; 414():159-66. PubMed ID: 22104386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Being overburdened and medically underserved: assessment of this double disparity for populations in the state of Maryland.
    Wilson S; Zhang H; Jiang C; Burwell K; Rehr R; Murray R; Dalemarre L; Naney C
    Environ Health; 2014 Apr; 13(1):26. PubMed ID: 24708780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental and risk screening for prioritizing pollution prevention opportunities in the U.S. printed wiring board manufacturing industry.
    Lam CW; Lim SR; Schoenung JM
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 May; 189(1-2):315-22. PubMed ID: 21398034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporation of potential for multimedia exposure into chemical hazard scores for pollution prevention.
    Whaley DA; Meloy TP; Barrett SS; Bedillion EJ
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1999 Feb; 22(1):241-73. PubMed ID: 10189582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.