These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9494243)

  • 1. Computerized mechanical validation of custom-made stems.
    Viceconti M; Bellingeri L; Baleani M; Toni A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1997; 82(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 9494243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The practice of CAD custom femoral prosthesis and the computer simulated biomechanical experiment].
    Jiang T; Sun D; Liu J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 24(6):1286-90. PubMed ID: 18232478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Study on design method for the individual anatomical hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Gong X; Kang L; Wang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 25(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 18435265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Primary rotatory stability of hip endoprostheses stems after manual and robot assisted implantation].
    Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15250002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. I.5. Biomechanics of implants.
    Hazenberg JG; Schmid J; Lee TC; Verkerke GJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 152():58-65. PubMed ID: 20407186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the fixation stiffness of some femoral stems of different designs.
    Sakai R; Kanai N; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 May; 21(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 16431001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-stage revision surgery to treat an infected hip implant. A comparison between a custom-made spacer and a pre-formed one.
    D'Angelo F; Negri L; Zatti G; Grassi FA
    Chir Organi Mov; 2005; 90(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 16681104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Westphal FM; Bishop N; Honl M; Hille E; Püschel K; Morlock MM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Oct; 21(8):834-40. PubMed ID: 16806616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
    Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
    Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis and stent design: Reduction of dogboning.
    De Beule M; Van Impe R; Verhegghe B; Segers P; Verdonck P
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):233-41. PubMed ID: 17065746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An FEA-based protocol for the pre-clinical validation of custom-made hip implants.
    Viceconti M; Baleani M; De Lollis A; Toni A
    J Med Eng Technol; 1998; 22(6):257-62. PubMed ID: 9884928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Migration of two different cementless hip arthroplasty stems in combination with two different heads: a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Klestil T; Morlock MM; Schwieger K; Sellenschloh K; Curda B; Biedermann R; Hennerbichler A; Schmoelz W; Rabl W; Blauth M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Aug; 126(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 16557367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A short stem solution: through small portals.
    Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The primary stability between manual and robot assisted implantation of hip prostheses: A biomechanical study on synthetic femurs].
    Decking J; Gerber A; Kränzlein J; Meurer A; Böhm B; Plitz W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15250003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The European school of total hip arthroplasty and 35 years of total hip arthroplasty in the Czech Republic.
    Cech O; Dzupa V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15860155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Navigation of short-stem implants.
    Lazovic D; Zigan R
    Orthopedics; 2006 Oct; 29(10 Suppl):S125-9. PubMed ID: 17407937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
    Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.