These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9494261)

  • 1. [Effect of temporal integration of loudness on perception of the withdrawal-approach of a sound source].
    Andreeva IG; Vartanian IA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1997; 23(6):5-11. PubMed ID: 9494261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An introduction to induced loudness reduction.
    Epstein M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL74. PubMed ID: 17927311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tactile enhancement of auditory detection and perceived loudness.
    Gillmeister H; Eimer M
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1160():58-68. PubMed ID: 17573048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Human assessment of signals modeling different directions of the motion of sound images].
    Kotelenko LM
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2003; 29(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 12679987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of fixed time versus intensity trade and fixed intensity versus time trade tests in sound lateralization.
    Dekio-Hotta S; Kaga K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Sep; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 16431062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectral loudness summation for sequences of short noise bursts.
    Verhey JL; Uhlemann M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):925-34. PubMed ID: 18247895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. fMRI activation in relation to sound intensity and loudness.
    Langers DR; van Dijk P; Schoenmaker ES; Backes WH
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(2):709-18. PubMed ID: 17254802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two auditory aftereffects and their dependency on carrier frequency.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 Dec; 28(6):569-71. PubMed ID: 7208272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of intensity and location on sound location discrimination in macaque monkeys.
    Recanzone GH; Beckerman NS
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):116-24. PubMed ID: 15567608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Inhibitory-excitatory interactions in the fields of aural neurons selective to the direction of spectral contrast movement].
    Malinina ES; Vartanian IA
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 2003; 39(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 12973910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Preference evaluation and autonomic responses during perception of sound intensity].
    Mukhamedrakhimov RZh
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1993; 19(2):45-52. PubMed ID: 8514020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of sound localization.
    Kaga M
    Acta Paediatr Jpn; 1992 Apr; 34(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 1621518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Atypical pattern of discriminating sound features in adults with Asperger syndrome as reflected by the mismatch negativity.
    Kujala T; Aho E; Lepistö T; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Nieminen-von Wendt T; von Wendt L; Näätänen R
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Apr; 75(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 17257732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
    Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual capture in auditory distance perception: proximity image effect reconsidered.
    Mershon DH; Desaulniers DH; Amerson TL; Kiefer SA
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 7345059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal weights in the level discrimination of time-varying sounds.
    Pedersen B; Ellermeier W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):963-72. PubMed ID: 18247899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Spectral analysis of the human EEG during listening to musical compositions].
    Pavlygina RA; Sakharov DS; Davydov VI
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2004; 30(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 15040288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceived loudness of speech based on the characteristics of glottal excitation source.
    Seshadri G; Yegnanarayana B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):2061-71. PubMed ID: 19813815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sustained magnetic fields reveal separate sites for sound level and temporal regularity in human auditory cortex.
    Gutschalk A; Patterson RD; Rupp A; Uppenkamp S; Scherg M
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):207-16. PubMed ID: 11771990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Are sex specific differences in loudness perception an artefact of ear canal size?].
    Hellbrück J; Oguey MC; Seiler C
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1984; 31(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 6475144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.