BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9494438)

  • 1. Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement.
    Ployhart RE; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 1998 Feb; 83(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9494438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews.
    Bye HH; Sandal GM
    J Bus Psychol; 2016; 31(4):569-582. PubMed ID: 27881901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Job context, selection decision outcome, and the perceived fairness of selection tests: biodata as an illustrative case.
    Elkins TJ; Phillips JS
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Jun; 85(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 10900821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effects of Regulatory Fit between Explanation Framing and Applicants' Regulatory Foci on Applicant Reaction.
    Bian R; Lin P; Gao Q; Li J; Yang X
    J Psychol; 2020; 154(2):176-198. PubMed ID: 31738655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An Examination of Organizational Justice and Attribution Frameworks.
    Ployhart RE; Ryan AM
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1997 Dec; 72(3):308-35. PubMed ID: 9606169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fairness heuristics and substitutability effects: inferring the fairness of outcomes, procedures, and interpersonal treatment when employees lack clear information.
    Qin X; Ren R; Zhang ZX; Johnson RE
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):749-66. PubMed ID: 25365727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system.
    Bell BS; Wiechmann D; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Mar; 91(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 16551196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness.
    Schminke M; Ambrose ML; Cropanzano RS
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Apr; 85(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 10783545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Organizational justice and Black applicants' reactions to affirmative action.
    Cropanzano R; Slaughter JE; Bachiochi PD
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Nov; 90(6):1168-84. PubMed ID: 16316272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions.
    Ambrose ML; Cropanzano R
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 12731710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event justice perceptions and employees' reactions: perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator.
    Choi J
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 May; 93(3):513-28. PubMed ID: 18457484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Justice orientation as a moderator of the framing effect on procedural justice perception.
    Sasaki H; Hayashi Y
    J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 24873027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.
    De Cremer D; Tyler TR
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 17484547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Different Rejection Letters on Applicants' Reactions.
    Cortini M; Galanti T; Barattucci M
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2019 Sep; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 31546985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Language of Fairness: how Cross-Linguistic Norms in Spanish and English Influence Reactions to Unfair Treatment.
    Birk SJ; Kausel EE
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Nov; 19():E79. PubMed ID: 27841105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interplay between different forms of power and meritocratic considerations shapes fairness perceptions.
    Lois G; Riedl A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11428. PubMed ID: 35794178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the motivational effects of procedural and informational justice in feedback processes.
    Roberson QM; Stewart MM
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Aug; 97(Pt 3):281-98. PubMed ID: 16848943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.
    van den Bos K; Lind EA; Vermunt R; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 May; 72(5):1034-46. PubMed ID: 9150583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Justice, perceived threat and vaccination intention in the USA.
    Lucas T; Pierce J
    Health Promot Int; 2018 Feb; 33(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 27335424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey.
    Nørskov S; Damholdt MF; Ulhøi JP; Jensen MB; Ess C; Seibt J
    Front Robot AI; 2020; 7():586263. PubMed ID: 33501344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.